Skip to main content

Table 2 Pearson Correlation Table for resistance, cadence, stimulation intensity, APO, KPO, HPO and RPF.

From: Leg joint power output during progressive resistance FES-LCE cycling in SCI subjects: developing an index of fatigue

  

Resistance

Cadence

Stimulation Intensity

Ankle Power Output

Knee Power Output

Hip Power Output

Resultant Pedal Force

Resistance

Pearson Correlation

1

     

.227

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

      

.417

 

N

15

     

15

Cadence

Pearson Correlation

-.476

1

    

.285

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.073

     

.304

 

N

15

15

    

15

Stim

Pearson Correlation

.662(**)

-.553(*)

1

   

-.356

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.007

.033

    

.193

 

N

15

15

15

   

15

APowerOut

Pearson Correlation

-.346

.864(**)

-.658(**)

1

  

.484

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.207

.000

.008

   

.067

 

N

15

15

15

15

  

15

KPowerOut

Pearson Correlation

-.537(*)

.818(**)

-.837(**)

.889(**)

1

 

.559(*)

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.039

.000

.000

.000

  

.030

 

N

15

15

15

15

15

 

15

HPowerOut

Pearson Correlation

.804(**)

-.184

.438

-.108

-.320

1

.163

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.512

.102

.701

.245

 

.562

 

N

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

ResPedalForce

Pearson Correlation

.227

.285

-.356

.484

.559(*)

.163

1

 

Sig. (2-tailed)

.417

.304

.193

.067

.030

.562

 
 

N

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

  1. ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
  2. * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Back to article page

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

ISSN: 1743-0003

Contact us