Spatial mapping of posture-dependent resistance to passive displacement of the hypertonic arm post-stroke

Table 1 Subject characteristics

Subject	Sex	Age	Year post stroke	Stroke Type	Paretic Side	MAS	Impairment	FM	Elbow		Shoulder		Handed
Subject	Sex	Age	Year post stroke	Stroke Type	Paretic Side	MAS	Impairment	FM	min flex	max ext	min flex	max ext	Handed
HS01	F	54	9	I	L	1.25	Mild	53	60	175	70	160	R
HS02	F	58	25	H	L	2	Severe	19	60	175	70	160	R
HS03	F	63	5.7	I	L	0.5	Mild	40	60	175	70	160	A
HS04	F	53	5.9	H	L	2.5	Moderate	27	60	175	70	160	R
HS05	M	49	6	I	L	2	Severe	23	35	95	80	130	L
HS06	M	59	2.10	I	R	1	Moderate	38	100	40	100	30	R
HS07	M	52	28	H	L	1.75	Severe	24	80	165	70	160	R
HS08	F	53	12	I	L	2.5	Moderate	31	80	165	70	160	R
HS09	M	61	3	I	R	3.5	Moderate	29	100	40	100	30	R
HS10	M	64	8	I	L	2	Mild	43	80	165	70	160	R
NI01	M	43							100	40	100	30	R
NI02	F	52							100	40	100	30	R
NI03	M	49							100	40	100	30	R
NI04	M	45							100	40	100	30	R
NI05	M	63							100	40	100	30	R
NI06	F	60							100	40	100	30	R
NI07	F	58							100	40	100	30	R
NI08	M	58							100	40	100	30	R
NI09	F	55							100	40	100	30	R

Stroke Type: I ischemic stroke, H hemorrhagic stroke, MAS modified Ashworth score, averaged across joints [e.g. if elbow flexion = 1 and elbow extension = 1 + , then MAS = (1 + 1.5)/2], FM Fugl Meyer Score, upper extremity portion (max = 66), EF elbow flexion, EE elbow extension, SF shoulder flexion, SE shoulder extension, Handed handedness, R right, L left, A ambidextrous

ISSN: 1743-0003