Skip to main content

Table 3 The levels of prediction for gender-specific model

From: Prediction of dysphagia aspiration through machine learning-based analysis of patients’ postprandial voices

Model

Male models

Female models

Pre-trained models

Non-pre-trained models

Pre-trained models

Non-pre-trained models

mn40_as

mn30_as

mn4.0

mn3.0

mn40_as

mn30_as

mn4.0

mn3.0

AUC (area under the curve)

AUC average

(95% CI)

0.7550

(0.6056, 0.9045)

0.8010

(0.6589, 0.9432)

0.7429

(0.6262, 0.8596)

0.6905

(0.5358, 0.8451)

0.7622

(0.6169, 0.9075)

0.7572

(0.6578, 0.8567)

0.7679

(0.6426, 0.8931)

0.7100

(0.5595, 0.8605)

AUC max

in 10 folds

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

0.9779

0.9722

0.9559

Accuracy (%)

Accuracy average

(95% CI)

79.44

(69.01, 89.88)

85.13

(78.07, 92.19)

78.61

(70.21, 87.01)

69.96

(58.61, 81.30)

69.17

(58.35, 79.99)

69.16

(61.76, 76.57)

69.16

(62.42, 75.89)

69.30

(61.13, 77.48)

Accuracy max

in 10 folds

100.00

100.00

96.00

87.50

93.10

88.00

78.57

88.00

mAP (mean average precision, %)

mAP average

(95% CI)

78.13

(65.24, 91.03)

82.36

(70.38, 94.34)

76.66

(66.13, 87.19)

74.88

(62.57, 87.20)

75.69

(63.10, 88.29)

75.86

(66.33, 85.40)

74.65

(64.61, 84.69)

71.55

(59.37, 83.74)

mAP max

in 10 folds

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

97.19

97.49

95.44

Sensitivity (%)

Sensitivity average

(95% CI)

79.79

(69.85, 89.73)

84.95

(77.73, 92.16)

78.61

(70.21, 87.01)

69.96

(58.61, 81.30)

69.42

(58.74, 80.10)

69.16

(61.76, 76.57)

69.16

(62.42, 75.89)

69.30

(61.13, 77.48)

Sensitivity max

in 10 folds

100.00

100.00

96.00

87.50

93.10

88.00

78.57

88.00

Specificity (%)

Specificity average

(95% CI)

73.22

(59.93, 86.50)

75.92

(62.97, 88.86)

68.75

(57.86, 79.64)

65.39

(54.48, 76.30)

61.55

(49.89, 73.21)

64.78

(56.87, 72.70)

50.00

(50.00, 50.00)

54.65

(46.67, 62.63)

Specificity max in 10 folds

100.00

100.00

91.67

87.50

92.86

81.25

50.00

84.56

Precision (%)

Precision average

(95% CI)

73.57

(60.88, 86.25)

74.68

(60.26, 89.10)

71.37

(56.10, 86.63)

68.61

(57.10, 80.11)

64.87

(49.88, 79.86)

66.26

(55.97, 76.55)

34.58

(31.21, 37.94)

41.84

(28.80, 54.89)

Precision max in 10 folds

100.00

100.00

97.73

90.00

86.36

92.50

39.29

87.30

F1 Score

F1 Score average

(95% CI)

0.7971

(0.6997, 0.8946)

0.8317

(0.7407, 0.9228)

0.7744

(0.6855, 0.8632)

0.6973

(0.5957, 0.7989)

0.6611

(0.5449, 0.7772)

0.6878

(0.6201, 0.7555)

0.5689

(0.4829, 0.6548)

0.5962

(0.4874, 0.7051)

F1 Score max

in 10 folds

1.0000

1.0000

0.9576

0.8730

0.9202

0.8710

0.6914

0.8777

Loss

Loss average

(95% CI)

0.8648

(0.4610, 1.2690)

0.5064

(0.2040, 0.8090)

1.1312

(0.6060, 1.6560)

1.6051

(0.8250, 2.3860)

0.9823

(0.5800, 1.3850)

1.2326

(0.4640, 2.0010)

1.0512

(0.6140, 1.4890)

0.9657

(0.5680, 1.3630)

Loss max

in 10 folds

1.6027

1.1415

2.5325

4.3304

2.0750

4.0219

2.3448

1.9062

Train accuracy (%)

Train accuracy

average

(95% CI)

99.94

(99.80, 100.08)

100.00

(100.00, 100.00)

99.97

(99.91, 100.04)

99.97

(99.90, 100.04)

100.00

(100.00, 100.00)

99.92

(99.81, 100.04)

99.92

(99.81, 100.04)

99.81

(99.61, 100.00)

Train accuracy max

in 10 folds

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Train loss

Train loss average

(95% CI)

0.0065

(− 0.0037, 0.0168)

0.0033

(0.0018, 0.0049)

0.0013

(− 0.0004, 0.0029)

0.0016

(− 0.0004, 0.0036)

0.0150

(0.0014, 0.0287)

0.0284

(0.0045, 0.0523)

0.0298

(0.0046, 0.0550)

0.0357

(− 0.0047, 0.0760)

Train loss max

in 10 folds

0.0474

0.0078

0.0076

0.0092

0.0618

0.0799

0.0998

0.1849

  1. *The table shows average predictive performance across all folds of each model after tenfold cross-validation