From: Towards efficient motor imagery interventions after lower-limb amputation
 | Control group | Motor imagery group | Statistical significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative variables (Median values ± IQR) |  |  |  | |
Age (years) | 61 ± 6.88 | 53 ± 8.75 | W = 65, p = 0.03* | |
Body mass index (kg/m²) | 25.89 ± 2.93 | 25.24 ± 3.66 | W = 24, p = 0.73 | |
Force of the amputated leg (score/5) | 4.00 ± 1.00 | 4.00 ± 1.00 | W = 46.5, p = 0.58 | |
Stump length (transtibial) | 18.00 ± 1.00 | 18.00 ± 3.00 | W = 10, p = 0.67 | |
Stump length (transfemoral) | 35.00 ± 9.75 | 42.50 ± 4.25 | W = 2.50, p = 0.28 | |
Functional level (score/6–6 levels of walking with/without assistance) | 2.56 ± 2.00 | 3.11 ± 2.00 | W = 30, p = 0.36 | |
Qualitative variables (%) | Â | Â | Â | |
Gender (Males/Females) | 70/30 | 89/11 | χ2 = 0.20, p = 0.66 | |
Origin of the amputation (Cancer/infection/traumatic/vascular) | 20/50/-/30 | 11/22/45/22 | χ2 = 5.78, p = 0.12 | |
Side of the amputation (Dominant/non-dominant) | 60/40 | 80/20 | χ2 = 0.11, p = 0.74 | |
Type of amputation (Transtibial/transfemoral) | 40/60 | 67/33 | χ2 = 0.01, p = 0.99 |