Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation between CT and radiographic measurements, and rotational gait parameters

From: Femoral anteversion and tibial torsion only explain 25% of variance in regression analysis of foot progression angle in children with diplegic cerebral palsy

 

FPA

Contralat

Pelvic

Hip

Knee

Adjusted

Acetabular

Femoral

Knee

Tibial

  

FPA

rotation

rotation

rotation

FPA

version

anteversion

torsion

torsion

Contralat

0.424

         

FPA

(0.014)

Pelvic

0.068

−0.221

        

rotation

(0.707)

(0.218)

        

Hip

0.190

−0.064

−0.300

       

rotation

(0.289)

(0.722)

(0.090)

       

Knee

0.307

0.256

−0.197

−0.024

      

rotation

(0.083)

(0.150)

(0.273)

(0.894)

      

Adjusted

0.837

0.492

−0.489

0.331

0.376

     

FPA

(<0.001)

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.060)

(0.031)

     

Acetabular

0.045

−0.049

−0.211

0.152

0.039

0.155

    

version

(0.802)

(0.785)

(0.239)

(0.399)

(0.831)

(0.388)

    

Femoral

0.219

0.199

−0.290

0.385

0.052

0.350

0.132

   

anteversion

(0.221)

(0.268)

(0.102)

(0.027)

(0.772)

(0.046)

(0.464)

   

Knee

−0.003

0.178

−0.111

−0.155

0.135

0.059

−0.071

−0.117

  

torsion

(0.988)

(0.338)

(0.553)

(0.407)

(0.469)

(0.753)

(0.706)

(0.532)

  

Tibial

−0.344

−0.018

0.056

0.222

−0.214

−0.332

0.219

0.059

0.228

 

torsion

(0.050)

(0.921)

(0.758)

(0.215)

(0.232)

(0.059)

(0.220)

(0.743)

(0.218)

 

AP talo-1st

−0.120

0.178

−0.099

−0.127

−0.150

−0.042

−0.039

−0.255

0.238

0.083

MT

(0.520)

(0.339)

(0.595)

(0.497)

(0.419)

(0.822)

(0.836)

(0.167)

(0.215)

(0.656)

  1. FPA foot progression angle; AP talo-1st MT, anteroposterior talo-first metatarsal angle.
  2. Statistical signifance (p<0.05) was presented as bold characters.