From: Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots
Principal findings | Papers |
---|---|
Experimental paradigms | |
1. HHI research has predominantly focused on sensorimotor collaboration, not cooperation | |
Sensorimotor collaborations | Reed [56, 65], Groten [70], Melendez-Calderon [43], Ikeura [50], Rahman [51], Basdogan [52], Sallnas [53], Gentry [54, 64], van der Wel [55], Feth [66] |
Sensorimotor cooperation | |
2. The majority of HHI research has used visuomotor tasks with limited degrees-of-freedom | |
Constrained visuomotor tasks | Melendez-Calderon [43], Ikeura [50], Rahman [51], Basdogan [52], Sallnas [53], Gentry [54, 64], van der Wel [55], Reed [56] |
Whole-body non-visuomotor tasks | Galvez [86] |
3. In most HHI research, specific roles for each member of a dyad are rarely defined ahead of time | |
Unassigned roles | Reed [65], Groten [70], Melendez-Calderon [43], Rahman [51], Basdogan [52], Sallnas [53], Gentry [54, 64], van der Wel [55], Reed [56, 65], Feth [66] |
Assigned roles | |
Experimental outcomes | |
4. Dyads typically perform as well or better than either member of a dyad alone | |
Superior dyad performance | |
Equivalent individual and dyad performance | van der Wel [55] |
5. The addition of haptic feedback improves dyad performance compared to visual feedback alone | |
6. Members of a dyad apply higher forces than during either of their individual performances | |
7. Members of a dyad spontaneously assume specific roles, performing portions of a joint motor task | |
Starting or ending movement | |
Adding or absorbing energy | Feth [66] |