Prediction of gait recovery in spinal cord injured individuals trained with robotic gait orthosis

Table 2 Illustration of classification and joint group analysis from GMM for control and intervention groups

	Latent class	GMM analysis for control group		GMM analysis for intervention group			Joint group analysis of GMM
		# of subjects	Baseline measurement (mean ± SE)	# of subjects	Baseline measurement	Rate of change (P-value)	Difference in rate of change between two groups (P-value)
10MWT	Class 1	8	0.233 ± 0.050 m/s	8	0.124 ± 0.024 m/s	0.007 m/s/week	0.009
	Class 2	12	0.829 ± 0.047 m/s	12	0.838 ± 0.083 m/s	0.033 m/s/week**	0.029*
TUG	Class 1	8	61.27 ± 9.16 s	6	70.49 ± 14.56 s	−3.35 s/week	−4.55
TUG	Class 2	12	14.67 ± 0.81 s	12	15.04 ± 1.12 s	−0.41 s/week**	−0.32*
6MWT	Class 1	6	80.77 ± 18.33 m	6	42.27 ± 9.21 m	0.58 m/week	0.79
	Class 2	12	245.66 ± 21.02 m	12	279.40 ± 28.46 m	1.60 m/week	2.28

*Indicates p < 0.05, ** ndicates p < 0.01.
Note that in the control group two subjects who could not perform the 6MWT evaluation belonged to Class 1 for 10MWT and TUG, while two subjects in the intervention group who could not perform the TUG or 6MWT evaluations belonged to Class 1 for 10MWT.

ISSN: 1743-0003