Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between WBB based system and laboratory based force platform

From: Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the Nintendo Wii balance board: usability and validation

  

A1 (WBB)

A3 (Force platform)

Difference

ICC (95% CI)

SEM

STOE

PL (cm)

36.03 ± 7.88

35.03 ± 8.82

-1.00 ± 5.64

0.872 (0.676, 0.949)

5.941

VA (cm/s)

1.27 ± 0.28

1.17 ± 0.29

-0.10 ± 0.19

0.870 (0.672, 0.949)

0.622

STCE

PL (cm)

39.79 ± 6.37

36.67 ± 4.99

-3.11 ± 4.36

0.831 (0.572, 0.933)

2.175

VA (cm/s)

1.40 ± 0.22

1.22 ± 0.17

-0.18 ± 0.15*

0.824 (0.556, 0.931)

0.076

SOOE

PL (cm)

44.42 ± 8.54

41.34 ± 8.54

-3.09 ± 6.78

0.813 (0.528, 0.926)

3.390

VA (cm/s)

4.71 ± 0.94

4.14 ± 0.85

-0.57 ± 0.70*

0.820 (0.544, 0.929)

0.352

SOCE

PL (cm)

81.03 ± 18.02

70.36 ± 17.81

-10.67 ± 13.44*

0.836 (0.586, 0.935)

3.188

VA (cm/s)

8.58 ± 1.88

6.80 ± 2.01

-1.78 ± 1.79**

0.731 (0.321, 0.894)

0.140

  1. Numerical data of the scores of tested. The results are given in terms of mean and standard deviation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 show a significant difference between A1 and A3.