Table 1 ABF effect on sway parameters Parameters. COP-RMS, F95%, and Acc-RMS are reported, subject-by-subject, for trials with and without ABF. Percentage differences between these two conditions are also reported. Standard deviations are indicated in parenthesis.
From: Influence of a portable audio-biofeedback device on structural properties of postural sway
|  | COP-RMS (NO – ABF) [mm] | F95 % (NO – ABF) [Hz] | Acc-RMS (NO – ABF) [mm/s2] | COP-RMS (ABF) [mm] | F95 % (ABF) [Hz] | Acc-RMS (ABF) [mm/s2] | COP-RMS %difference | F95% %difference | Acc-RMS %difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subj. #1 | 10.79 (2.84) | 0.99 (0.05) | 137 (48) | 9.57 (1.86) | 1.18 (0.16) | 118 (13) | -11.2 | 19.1 | -14.1 |
Subj. #2 | 9.91 (2.77) | 1.20 (0.29) | 142 (27) | 9.50 (2.26) | 1.30 (0.20) | 120 (23) | -4.1 | 8.7 | -15.6 |
Subj. #3 | 9.21 (2.94) | 1.16 (0.14) | 121 (23) | 8.61 (1.42) | 1.37 (0.07) | 113 (21) | -6.5 | 18.0 | -7.0 |
Subj. #4 | 10.23 (1.50) | 1.43 (0.08) | 117 (30) | 8.80 (1.74) | 1.49 (0.12) | 100 (12) | -13.9 | 4.1 | -14.6 |
Subj. #5 | 8.50 (0.93) | 1.49 (0.22) | 143 (46) | 6.90 (1.35) | 1.53 (0.28) | 115 (19) | -18.8 | 2.6 | -19.3 |
Subj. #6 | 9.62 (1.55) | 1.34 (0.30) | 126 (43) | 7.35 (0.88) | 1.34 (0.09) | 89 (20) | -23.6 | 0.0 | -29.2 |
Subj. #7 | 6.37 (1.48) | 1.60 (0.07) | 64 (8.3) | 5.19 (0.59) | 1.94 (0.12) | 51 (4.7) | -18.5 | 20.8 | -20.1 |
Subj. #8 | 6.08 (1.19) | 1.78 (0.25) | 48 (6.3) | 6.75 (1.41) | 1.37 (0.16) | 39 (3.8) | 10.9 | -23.1 | -17.3 |
Average | 8.84 (1.75) | 1.37 (0.26) | 112 (36) | 7.83 (1.54) | 1.44 (0.15) | 93 (31) | -10.7 (10.92) | 6.2 (14.4) | -17.2 (6.3) |