From: Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation
 | Pre | Post | Change | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 (n = 8) | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Robot Score (RS) | 110.45 ± 64.54 | 163.74 ± 74.53 | 53.29 ± 40.11 | 0.01 |
Performance Index (PI) | 110.45 ± 64.54 | 199.73 ± 123.72 | 89.28 ± 99.53 | 0.04 |
Active Movement Index (AMI) | 54.13 ± 29.14 | 72.02 ± 24.43 | 17.88 ± 22.32 | n.s. |
Motor Power Score (0–20) | 13.67 ± 3.31 | 14.40 ± 2.84 | 1.13 ± 0.23 | n.s |
Fugl-Meyer (0–115) | 70.43 ± 10.63 | 75.71 ± 9.34 | 5.29 ± 4.39 | 0.04 |
Group 2 (n = 12) | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Robot Score (RS) | 204.90 ± 90.43 | 539.70 ± 248.59 | 334.80 ± 241.98 | 0.01 |
Performance Index (PI) | 204.90 ± 90.43 | 1006.3 ± 693.4 | 801.38 ± 671.98 | 0.02 |
Active Movement Index (AMI) | 76.57 ± 16.89 | 95.57 ± 7.28 | 19.00 ± 16.01 | 0.01 |
Mean Velocity (VM) | 32.84 ± 10.32 | 61.55 ± 17.55 | 28.71 ± 16.92 | 0.01 |
Mean Distance(MD) | 20.74 ± 10.72 | 12.42 ± 5.45 | -8.32 ± 8.68 | 0.01 |
Normalized Path Length (nPL) | 1.81 ± 0.59 | 1.51 ± 0.74 | -0.30 ± 0.69 | 0.01 |
Motor Power Score (0–20) | 12.00 ± 2.41 | 13.40 ± 2.74 | 1.40 ± 0.77 | 0.01 |
Fugl-Meyer (0–115) | 61.00 ± 8.17 | 65.67 ± 10.18 | 4.66 ± 5.02 | 0.01 |