Table 1 Quality assessment of the included studies
From: Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
| Â | Liu [22] | Page [24] | Page [25] | Page [23] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection of prognostic homogenous study population (disease progression) | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Concealment of random allocation | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Prestratification of prognostically relevant variables | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Random allocation (description of procedure) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Registration of loss to follow-up | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
Blinding of patients | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Blinding of persons who implement interventions | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Registration of co-interventions that bear on outcome for each group | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Blinding of persons who assess treatment effects | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Check to what extent blinding was successful | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |