Table 2 Studies excluded for evaluating effectiveness of biofeedback-based interventions.
From: Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review
Authors | Reason for exclusion |
|---|---|
Bisson et al [27] | Comparison of BF vs. virtual reality training |
Burnside et al [62] | No objective measure of a balance/mobility task |
De Bruin et al [31] | Comparison of 2 different forms of BF training |
Eser et al [34] | No objective measure of a balance/mobility task |
Gapsis et al [63] | No objective measure of a balance/mobility task |
Hamman et al [36] | No control group with older adults |
Hatzitaki et al [37] | Pre-, post-testing in a moving obstacle avoidance task |
Lindemann et al [43] | BF training was compared to home-based exercise |
Mudie et al [64] | Training of sitting balance |
Santilli et al [65] | No objective measure of a balance/mobility task |
Ustinova et al [50] | No control group with older adults |
Wissel et al [66] | No objective measure of a balance/mobility task |
Wolf et al [53] | No objective measure of a balance/mobility task |
Wolfson et al [54] | Comparison does not allow for evaluating BF-part |
Wu [67] | Only 2 control subjects, no comparison of group means |