Brain network involved in visual processing of movement stimuli used in upper limb robotic training: an fMRI study

Nocchi, Federico; Gazzellini, Simone; Grisolia, Carmela; Petrarca, Maurizio; Cannatà, Vittorio; Cappa, Paolo; D’Alessio, Tommaso; Castelli, Enrico

doi:10.1186/1743-0003-9-49

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Table 1 Differential activations between conditions

From: Brain network involved in visual processing of movement stimuli used in upper limb robotic training: an fMRI study

Contrast	Significant clusters	Brodmann areas	Size (voxels)	p	T	MNI coordinates
Contrast	Significant clusters	Brodmann areas	Size (voxels)	p	T	x	y	z
AM > DT	Occipital_Mid_L, Fusiform_R, Calcarine_L, Fusiform_L, Occipital_Inf_R, Cuneus_R, Occipital_Inf_L, Occipital_Mid_R, Cuneus_L, Occipital_Sup_L, Lingual_L, Cerebelum_6_R, Occipital_Sup_R, Temporal_Mid_R, Cerebelum_6_L, Cerebelum_Crus1_L, Lingual_R, Temporal_Mid_L, Calcarine_R, Temporal_Inf_R, Cerebelum_Crus1_R, Temporal_Inf_L, Cerebelum_4_5_R, Parietal_Sup_R	19, 18, 37, 17, 39, 36, 20, 23	4008	0.000	14.65	−42	−88	4
DT > AM	Temporal_Mid_R, Temporal_Sup_R, Rolandic_Oper_R, SupraMarginal_R, Postcentral_R, Heschl_R	21, 22, 42, 43, 41, 40	167	0.000	6.21	57	−16	13
	Temporal_Inf_L, Temporal_Mid_L	37, 21, 22	54	0.061*	5.53	−54	−55	−11
	Angular_R, Parietal_Inf_R, Occipital_Mid_R, Occipital_Sup_R, Parietal_Sup_R	7, 40, 19, 39	88	0.009	4.84	36	−64	43
AMT > DTT	Precuneus_R, Precuneus_L, Parietal_Sup_R, Parietal_Sup_L	7	114	0.003	5.19	−6	−70	55
DTT > AMT	Occipital_Mid_L, Fusiform_R, Fusiform_L, Occipital_Mid_R, Occipital_Inf_R, Occipital_Inf_L, Occipital_Sup_R, Lingual_L, Cerebelum_6_R, Occipital_Sup_L, Lingual_R, Cerebelum_6_L, Cerebelum_Crus1_L, Cuneus_L, Cuneus_R, Calcarine_L, Temporal_Mid_R, Temporal_Mid_L, Temporal_Inf_R, Cerebelum_4_5_R, Cerebelum_Crus1_R	19, 18, 37, 39, 17, 7	1830	0.000	10.72	−42	−88	1
CT > IT	Caudate_R, Thalamus_L, Thalamus_R	---	184	0.000	6.93	12	5	16
	Postcentral_L, Precentral_L	4, 3, 6	57	0.069*	6.41	−51	−10	46
	Cerebelum_6_R, Fusiform_R, Lingual_R, Cerebelum_Crus1_R, Temporal_Inf_R	18, 19, 37	252	0.000	5.59	33	−58	−23
	Putamen_R, Amygdala_R, Olfactory_R, ParaHippocampal_R, Rectus_R, Frontal_Sup_Orb_R	34, 25, 47	80	0.021	5.35	15	8	−23
AMCT > AMIT	Frontal_Mid_R, Frontal_Inf_Tri_R	46, 10	76	0.021	6.67	45	47	4
	Postcentral_L, Precentral_L	4, 3, 6	55	0.069*	6.20	−51	−10	46
	Cerebelum_6_R, Fusiform_R, Cerebelum_Crus1_R, Temporal_Inf_R	37, 19	91	0.010	4.52	33	−58	−23
	Cingulum_Mid_L, Supp_Motor_Area_R, Supp_Motor_Area_L, Cingulum_Mid_R	24, 6, 31	74	0.024	4.00	0	−4	64
DTCT > DTIT	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
IT > CT	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
AMIT > AMCT	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
DTIT > DTCT	Occipital_Sup_L, Calcarine_L, Cuneus_L, Occipital_Mid_L, Lingual_L	18, 17, 19	189	0.000	7.24	−12	−99	10

For each contrast, all significant clusters (p < 0.05 at cluster-level, FWE corrected) are shown. The anatomical areas defined in the Automatic Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas [48] and Brodmann areas are listed for each cluster, ordered by decreasing number of voxels. T-score and MNI coordinates refer to the voxel with the peak value. Clusters with 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 are also reported (marked with a star); these clusters were considered marginally significant.

Back to article page

ISSN: 1743-0003

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com