Skip to main content

Table 1 Sensitivity analysis for constant K line for the detection of power-line artifacts

From: High-density surface EMG maps from upper-arm and forearm muscles

k line (2.5)

1

2

3

5

7

Acc

99,74

99,79

99,79

99,74

99,79

S

83,33

83,33

83,33

75,00

75,00

SP

99,83

99,87

99,87

99,87

99,91

P

71,43

76,92

76,92

75,00

81,82

  1. klin e in Eq. 3 was chosen as 2.5 (presented in parenthesis). Increasing values of k line reduced the sensitivity (S) of the threshold thresh line/t , whereas decreasing values decreased the precision (P). Variations in these two indexes affected the Accuracy (Acc) and the Specificity (SP). k line = 2.5 is a good compromise between S and P.