Skip to main content

Table 2 Phase 2 functional outcomes

From: Clinical feasibility of interactive motion-controlled games for stroke rehabilitation

Outcome measuresa

Week 0

Week 4

Within-group difference (Week 4 – Week 0)a

Between-group difference (Mean 95 % CI)

 

Intervention

Control

Intervention

Control

Intervention

Control

Intervention - Control

FIM transfers, /7

6.0 (4.0-6.0)

5.5 (4.3-6.0)

6.5 (6.0-7.0)

6.0 (5.0-7.0)

1.0 (1.1)*

0.6 (1.1)

0.4 (−0.8 to 1.6)

FIM mobility, /7

5.5 (2.5-6.0)

5.0 (2.0-6.0)

6.5 (6.0-7.0)

6.0 (2.8-7.0)

1.8 (1.7)*

1.0 (1.7)

0.8 (−1.0 to 2.6)

FIM stairs, /7

5.5 (1.8-6.0)

5.0 (1.0-6.0)

6.0 (4.3-6.0)

5.0 (2.0-6.0)

0.6 (1.4)

0.5 (1.9)

0.1 (−1.7 to 1.9)

Motor Assessment Scale, /48

29.0 (24.0-36.0)

35.5 (24.8-39.0)

33.5 (26.3-39.8)

35.5 (23.5-44.8)

2.4 (4.7)

2.4 (5.6)

0 (−5.5 to 5.5)

Functional Reach, cm Unable to do, N (%) b

24.0 (8.0) 1 (12.5 %)

25.4 (8.9) 1 (12.5 %)

26.3 (8.3) 1 (12.5 %)

28.3 (14.0) 1 (12.5 %)

2.3 (8.4)

3.8 (9.1)

−1.5 (−10.9 to 7.8)

Step Test (affected), number of steps in 15 s Unable to do, N (%) b

0 (0–9.8) 5 (62.5 %)

8.0 (0–11.0) 3 (37.5 %)

2.5 (0–13.0) 4 (50 %)

1.0 (0–8.3) 4 (50 %)

1.6 (5.0)

−2.4 (5.3)

4.0 (−1.5 to 9.5)

Step Test (unaffected), number of steps in 15 s Unable to do, N (%) b

2.0 (0–10.3) 4 (50 %)

6.0 (0–7.0) 3 (37.5 %)

6.0 (0–11.5) 3 (37.5 %)

2.5 (0–10.3) 4 (50 %)

2.0 (4.0)

0 (5.8)

2.0 (−3.3 to 7.3)

6 min Walk Test, m Unable to do, N (%) b

82 (0–248) 3 (37.5 %)

95 (0–288) 3 (37.5 %)

160 (110–276) 0

274 (45–306) 1 (12.5 %)

64.3 (69.4)*

75.1 (151.9)

−10.8 (−137.4 to 115.8)

  1. Abbreviations: FIM, Functional Independence Measure; affected, affected leg in stance; unaffected, unaffected leg in stance during test
  2. aPresented as mean (SD) or median (IQR); bIf unable to do, the score was recorded as zero
  3. *Significant within-group difference P < 0.05 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test)