From: Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review
Study & Design | Participants | Exoskeleton & Training Period | Training Protocol | Walking outcomes & Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Subacute Stroke | ||||
Watanabe et al. (2014) [31] Unblinded RCT | Sub-acute stroke 1 – 2 person assist ambulation (HAL group n = 11, mean 58.9 days post-stroke Conventional group n = 11, mean 50.6 days post-stroke) | HAL – Unilateral 12 sessions over 4 weeks 20 minute sessions | HAL group – gait training while wearing HAL, facilitating improvements in walking ability, partial BWS if needed; progress as able from complete assistance by device to assist-as-needed through bioelectric signal detection Conventional group – facilitate improvements in walking ability, customized to functional level; speed and duration of walking gradually increased | 1) TUG – No significant difference in improvement between groups 2) 6MWT – No significant difference in improvement between groups 3) Gait speed – No significant difference in improvement between groups 4) FAC – HAL group improved significantly (p = 0.04) more than Conventional group (change of +1.1 for HAL group; change of +0.6 for Conventional group) |
Nilsson et al. (2014) [32] Pre-post study | Sub-acute stroke 1 – 2 person assist ambulation (n = 8, 6 – 46 days post-stroke) | HAL – Bilateral 5 sessions/week, median 17 sessions 25 minutes training | Progression from weight shift control to bioelectric signalling control, training with BWS on treadmill; progression of speed and BWS as tolerated | 1) 10MWT – median change of +0.24 m/s, 4 previously non-ambulatory progressed to ambulatory 2) FAC – median change of +1.5 (from 0 to 1.5) |
Fukuda et al. (2015) [33] Pre-post study | Sub-acute stroke (n = 53, 12 non-ambulatory, 41 ambulatory) | HAL – Uni/bilateral 2 sessions/week, mean 3.9 sessions | Walking on treadmill in exoskeleton, progress from complete control to bioelectric signalling | 1) 10MWT – change of +0.1 m/s for Brunnstrom stage III (greater severity with lower stage) (n = 12); no change for Brunnstrom stage IV (n = 7); change of +0.1 m/s for Brunnstrom stage V (n = 12); change of +0.4 m/s for Brunnstrom stage VI (N = 10) |
Maeshima et al. (2011) [34] Pre-post study | Sub-acute stroke 1 – 2 person assist ambulation (n = 16, 27 – 116 days post-stroke) | HAL – Bilateral Single session | Walking and stair practice after standing practice in exoskeleton | 1) 10MWT – positive change for 14 of 16 patients (values not provided) |
Chronic Stroke | ||||
Buesing et al. (2015) [35] Single-blind RCT | Chronic stroke Limited community ambulation (SMA group – n = 25, mean 7.1 years post-stroke Functional task specific training group – n = 25, mean 5.4 years post-stroke) | SMA – Bilateral 18 sessions over 6 – 8 weeks 45 minute sessions | SMA group – 30 minutes of high intensity overground walking with SMA (12-16 RPE or 75 % HR max) and 15 minutes of dynamic functional gait training with SMA (varied surfaces, multi-directional stepping, stair climbing, obstacles, community mobility) Functional task specific training group – 15 minutes of high intensity overground walking training and 30 minutes of functional goal-based mobility training | 1) Gait speed – No significant difference in improvement between groups |
Stein et al. (2014) [36] Single-blind RCT | Chronic stroke Independent ambulation (AlterG group n = 12, mean 49.1 months post-stroke Exercise group n = 12, mean 88.5 months post-stroke) | AlterG – Unilateral 18 sessions over 6 weeks 60 minute sessions | AlterG group – standardized overground functional tasks including transfers, stepping, turning, reaching, gait training, stairs and curbs while wearing exoskeleton Exercise group – group exercises including relaxation, meditation, self-stretching, active range of motion of upper and lower limbs, minimal gait training (5 min/session) | 1) TUG – No significant difference between groups 2) 6MWT – No significant difference in improvements between groups 3) 10MWT – No significant difference in improvement between groups |
Yoshimoto et al. (2015) [37] Non-randomized controlled trial | Chronic stroke Independent ambulation (HAL group n = 9, mean 92.4 months post-stroke Conventional PT group n = 9, mean 80.5 months post-stroke) | HAL – Unilateral 8 sessions over 8 weeks 60 minute sessions | HAL group – 20 minutes of HAL walking per session, with some BWS, walking at speed 1.5-1.7 times max walking speed without device Conventional PT group – exercise to improve walking ability including static and dynamic postural tasks, range of motion, and 20 minutes of overground walking training | 1) TUG – HAL group improved significantly compared to Conventional PT group (change of -11.5 s for HAL group; change of +0.1 s for Conventional PT group) 2) 10MWT – HAL group improved significantly compared to Conventional PT group (change of +0.21 m/s for HAL group; change of -0.02 m/s for Conventional PT group) |
Kawamoto et al. (2013) [38] Pre-post study | Chronic stroke (n = 16, 1 – 11 years post-stroke, 8 dependent ambulatory, 8 independent ambulatory) | HAL – Bilateral 16 sessions over 8 weeks 20 – 30 minutes training | Overground walking with overhead harness for safety and partial BWS; gradual progression from sit-to-stand to walking (gradually increased intensity by changing speed, duration, BWS, and HAL control mechanism) | 1) TUG – mean change of -1.1 s 2) 10MWT – mean change of +0.04 m/s |
Bortole et al. (2015) [39] Pre-post study | Chronic stroke Independent ambulation (n = 3; 60, 6, 11 months post-stroke) | H2 – Bilateral 12 sessions over 4 weeks 30 minute sessions | Overground walking over a linear track Participants in charge of speed and encouraged to walk as much as possible, with breaks | 1) TUG – change of +1.7 s, -2.5 s, -2.5 s 2) 6MWT – change of -115 m, +16 m, +103 m |
Byl et al. (2012) [40] Pre-post study | Chronic stroke Independent ambulation (n = 3; 6, 1.3, 10 years post-stroke) | AlterG – Unilateral 2 – 4 sessions/week over 4 weeks 90 minute sessions | Walking practice, with sit-to-stand transfers, squatting, and stepping activities; obstacle clearance, uneven terrain, community ambulation, stair climbing | 1) TUG – change of -6.9 s, +1.9 s, -0.2 s 2) 6MWT – change of +37 m, +47 m, +29 m 3) 10MWT – change of +0.21 m/s, +0.14 m/s, +0.20 m/s |
Wong et al. (2011) [41] Pre-post study | Chronic stroke Independent ambulation (n = 3; 37, 26, 40 months post-stroke) | AlterG – Unilateral 18 sessions over 6 weeks 60 minute sessions | 45 minutes while wearing device, standardized weight-bearing functional mobility activities, sit-to-stand transfers, balance exercises, gait practice at various speeds on different surfaces, functional task practice | 1) TUG – change of -11.7 s, -2.3 s, -4.2 s 2) 6MWT – change of +17 m, +14 m, +15 m 3) 10MWT – change of -0.01 m/s, +0.05 m/s, +0.13 m/s |