Skip to main content

Table 3 The relationship between task performance of subjects with stroke and Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT) scores is shown by the corresponding Spearman correlations

From: A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke

Parameters (normative models) Spearman correlations r s (P)
  FIM total MoCA BIT
  Global performance
Target hits 0.52 (3×10−12) 0.38 (1×10−6) 0.48 (2×10−10)
Distractor hits −0.14 (0.09) −0.31 (1×10−4) −0.17 (0.03)
Object hits 0.45 (3×10−9) 0.23 (0.004) 0.40 (2×10−7)
Distractor proportion −0.45 (4×10−9) −0.49 (2×10−10) −0.43 (2×10−8)
Object processing rate 0.39 (6×10−7) 0.27 (6×10−4) 0.33 (3×10−5)
  Spatial and temporal performance
Miss bias 0.10 (0.22) −0.08 (0.32) 0.20 (0.01)
Hand transition −0.16 (0.05) −0.11 (0.17) −0.03 (0.72)
Median error 0.48 (3×10−10) 0.36 (6×10−6) 0.44 (8×10−9)
  Hand specific performance
Hand bias (hits) −0.01 (0.93) 0.12 (0.15) −0.20 (0.01)
Hand selection overlap 0.30 (2×10−4) 0.11 (0.18) 0.10 (0.21)
Total hand bias area 0.02 (0.80) 0.15 (0.07) −0.15 (0.06)
Hand bias speed −0.01 (0.87) 0.13 (0.11) −0.18 (0.02)
Object hits Affected 0.51 (1×10−11) 0.24 (0.003) 0.38 (7×10−7)
Unaffected 0.26 (8×10-4) 0.17 (0.04) 0.30 (1×10-4)
Distractor proportion Affected −0.45 (5×10−9) −0.31 (8×10−5) −0.36 (4×10−6)
Unaffected −0.37 (2×10−6) −0.48 (4×10−10) −0.41 (9×10−8)
Total hand area affected 0.44 (6×10−9) 0.07 (0.43) 0.22 (0.005)
Unaffected 0.14 (0.08) 0.17 (0.04) 0.29 (3×10−4)
hand speed Affected 0.52 (3×10−12) 0.14 (0.09) 0.33 (2×10−5)
Unaffected 0.24 (0.002) 0.16 (0.06) 0.35 (7×10−6)
Parameters impaired −0.61 (2×10−17) −0.31 (1×10−4) −0.43 (3×10−8)
  1. Abbreviations: RH (right hand), LH (left hand), LA (left-affected subject), RA (right-affected subject)