Skip to main content

Table 7 Articles excluded following full-text review

From: The effects of error-augmentation versus error-reduction paradigms in robotic therapy to enhance upper extremity performance and recovery post-stroke: a systematic review

Abdollahi et al. (2011) [75]

This study is a pilot study of Abdollahi et al. (2014) [52].

Agostini et al. (2011) [76]

This study lack of control group.

Arab Baniasad et al. (2014) [77]

It is a conference abstract, possibly lack of control group as well.

Badia et al. (2008) [78]

It is the same study as the one of Cameirao et al. (2008)

Basteris et al. (2014) [79]

It is a review

Beling et al. (2015) [80]

It is a conference abstract, and it does not have the intervention of interest

Broeren et al. (2007) [81]

It does not have the intervention of interest.

Cameirao et al. (2012) [82]

It does not have the intervention of interest.

Cameirao et al. (2008) [83]

It is a review.

Casadio et al. (2009) [84]

It does not have the intervention of interest and lacks of a control group.

Chemuturi et al. (2013) [85]

This study only recruited healthy subjects and it does not have an the intervention of interest.

Chemuturi et al. (2013) [86]

This study by the same authors as above also only recruited healthy subjects and it does not have an the intervention of interest.

Coote et al. (2008) [87]

This study lacks a control group of interest.

Crocher et al. (2012) [88]

This study does not have interventions of interest or results of interest.

De Santis et al. (2015) [89]

This study does not have a control group and it lacks outcomes of interest.

Fasoli et al. (2004) [90]

This study does not have a proper control group.

Fischer et al. (2016) [91]

This study does not have the intervention of interest.

Fluet et al. (2011) [92]

It is a conference abstract.

Fluet et al. (2012) [93]

It is a book.

Fluet et al. (2014) [94]

This study does not have the intervention of interest.

Hachisuka et al. (2014) [95]

It is a conference abstract.

Housman et al. (2009) [96]

It is the same study as the one of Rozario et al. (2009) [60].

Huang and Patton(2011) [97]

It has the same results as the one of Huang and Patton(2013) [59].

Israely and Carmeli (2016) [40]

It is a review.

Krebs et al. (2008) [98]

This study does not have the intervention of interest.

Lam et al. (2008) [99]

This study only has healthy subjects, and it lacks of the intervention of interest.

Lambercy et al. (2011) [100]

This study lacks of a control group.

Lemmens et al. (2012) [101]

It is a conference abstract.

Liao et al. (2012) [102]

This study does not have the intervention of interest.

Lin et al. (2015) [103]

This study does not have the intervention of interest.

Milot et al. (2016) [104]

This paper is about design and implementation, and not intervention-oriented.

Oblak et al. (2010) [105]

This paper is not intervention-oriented.

Orihuela-Espina et al. (2016) [106]

This study does not have the intervention of interest.

Patton and Mussa-Ivaldi (2004) [107]

This study only recruited healthy subjects.

Perry et al. (2011) [108]

This study is not intervention-oriented.

Phyo et al. (2016) [109]

This study lacks of the intervention and results of interest.

Squeri et al. (2014) [110]

This study lacks of a control group.

Stein et al. (2004) [111]

This study contains subjects under 21 years old.

Timmermans et al. (2012) [112]

It is a conference abstract.

Timmermans et al. (2012) [113]

It is another conference abstract by the same author as above.

Turolla et al. (2013) [114]

This study does not have a control group.

Waldner et al. (2009) [115]

This study is not intervention-oriented.

Ziheri et al. (2010) [116]

This study does not have the intervention or control of interest.

Zondervan et al. (2013) [117]

This study does not have the intervention of interest.