Ref. | Actuation (Pf/Df) | Control | weight PAFO | Subjects | Training and comparisons | Walking Speed | Ul / Bl | Portable | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bharadwaj, 2005 [61] | SOM (Pf + Df), passive inv + ev | P-Bc | / | 1 H | / | fixed gait time | Ul | / | lower RoM than in N |
Hwang, 2006 [57] | SEA (Pf + Df) | P-Bc: Pf assist during LR and PO, Df assist during MSt and swing | 2.8 kg | 5 H | N-A-P | / | Ul | no | AFO leads to inefficient walking; in P ↑ PO torque |
Kim, 2007 [59] | SEA (Pf + Df) | P-Bc: Pf assist during LR and PO, Df assist during MSt and swing | 2.8 kg | 1 Hem | Training: 4 weeks; Test: 30 min + N-A-P | / | Ul | no | ↑ walking speed and cadence; ↓ asymmetry; prevented foot drop; ↑ Df RoM; improved Pf in PO |
Kim, 2011 [58] | SEA (Pf + Df) | P-Bc: Pf assist during LR and PO, Df assist during MSt and swing | 2.8 kg | 3 Hem | Training: 4 weeks; Test: 30 min + N-A-P | / | Ul | no | ↑ walking speed and cadence; ↓ asymmetry; prevented foot drop; ↑ Df RoM; improved Pf in PO |
Ward, 2007 [62] | SOM (Pf + Df), passive inv + ev | P-Bc | / | 1 Str | Training: 8 weeks; Pre-, mid- and post-tests: N | Self-selected | Ul | / | improved kinematics; ↑ walking cadence; for some tests results in line with training without PAFO |
Ward, 2011 [60] | SEA (Pf) | P-Bc: assist PO | / | 3 Str | Training: 3 weeks; Pre- and post-test: N | Self-selected | Ul | no | ↑ cadence; ↑ RoM |