Overground walking patterns after chronic incomplete spinal cord injury show distinct response patterns to unloading

Table 1 CiSCI characteristics

	Characteristics							ASIA			Sensory			SEP		MEP
#	Sex	Age	Lesion Level	TSI [yrs]	Height [cm]	Weight [kg]	10mWT [s]	LEMS (50)	LT (56)	PP (56)	POS (4)	VIB (48)	RB (2)	L [ms]	R [ms]	L [ms]	R [ms]
01	m	35	C2	1.16	177	74.7	6.97	49	34	42	4	40	0	45	45	32	31
02	m	68	C4	0.5	184	99.4	8.91	47	56	52	3	12	1	42	41	29	29
03	m	64	C2	11	172	88.8	9.15	48	40	44	4	12	2	52	52	43	41
04	m	29	C6	1.25	176	63.7	17.21	42	40	33	4	28	2	41	43	30	31
05	f	64	C6	4.3	166	48.5	9.27	46	55	52	3	46	1	46	46	34	35
06	m	44	C2	13	188	96.8	10.17	47	11	10	3	12	2	55	52	32	33
07	f	46	T8	0.3	171	94.8	5.78	47	32	20	4	48	0	41	41	29	29
08	f	52	T9	7.25	177	81.1	13.09	40	52	52	3	28	2	44	47	32	31
09	m	68	C7	0.4	167	58.2	6.47	49	56	56	4	42	0	45	42	NA	NA
10	m	38	C6	8.25	182	71.7	7.31	45	30	13	4	34	0	56	54	32	33
11	m	48	C2	13.2	177	77	6.82	48	56	56	4	38	1	43	42	29	29
12	m	63	T9	6.1	17	80	17.41	43	35	15	3	3	2	53	47	35	32

Characteristics of the individuals with iSCI included in the analysis, especially the time since injury (TSI) and the ten-meter walking test (10mWT) as a measure of walking function. This also includes the summation of the left and right lower extremity motor scores (LEMS), light touch scores (LT), and pin prick scores (PP) along with position sense (POS), vibration sense (VIB) and Romberg (RB) scores. Latencies from sensory evoked potentials (SEP) and cortical motor evoked potentials (MEP) are reported for the tibial nerve (NA: Not assessed). Where appropriate, units and maximal possible scores are indicated in parenthesis

ISSN: 1743-0003