Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant details

From: Boosting robot-assisted rehabilitation of stroke hemiparesis by individualized selection of upper limb movements – a pilot study

participant

age

sex

hand

years since last stroke

Brain Lesion locations

FMA-UE (baseline)

dominant

affected

C1

65

F

R

R

2.5

L BG, L thal

11

C2

68

M

R

R

7

L front-par, L temp, L insula, L BG

40.5

C3

59

M

R

L

4

R par, R front

9.5

C4

43

F

R

L

2

R front, R par-temp, R hipp atrophy

47

C5

48

F

R

R

4

L hemispherea

27

C6

20

F

R

R

2.5

L hemisphere (very large lesion)a

16

C7

75

M

R

L

10.5

R thal, R BG

20

C8

65

M

R

R

1

bilateral BG, bilateral thal, EnV

17

C9

58

M

R

R

3.5

L front-par (large lesion), L occ, L thal, L BG, EnV (especially L)

18

T1

65

F

R

R

3

L BG, L hipp atrophy

26.5

T2

60

M

L

R

3

L front-par, L insula, L temp

38

T3

51

M

R

L

3

R hemisphere lesiona

7.5

T4

57

M

R

R

9

L front-temp, L thal, L BG

14

T5

58

M

R

R

1

L thal, L CC (anterior), WM atrophy

12

T6

60

M

L

L

2.5

R BG, R thal, R EnV, R temp

10.5

T7

79

F

R

R

4.5

L BG, L thal, L EnV, L insula atrophy

20.5

  1. C1–9: control; T1–7: test. Here FMA-UE score is the average across two baseline assessments. Anatomical abbreviations: BG basal ganglia, CC corpus callosum, EnV enlarged ventricles, front frontal cortex, hipp hippocampus, occ occipital cortex, par parietal cortex, temp temporal cortex, thal thalamus, WM white matter
  2. aBased on family doctor’s notes