Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant information

From: Effects of extended powered knee prosthesis stance time via visual feedback on gait symmetry of individuals with unilateral amputation: a preliminary study

Subject

1

2

3

4

5

Gender

Male

Male

Male

Male

Female

Height

1.8 m

1.8 m

1.7 m

1.8 m

1.7 m

Body Weight

69 kg

94 kg

61 kg

69 kg

49 kg

Age

24 years

59 years

27 years

19 years

52 years

Time since Amputation

7 years

47 years

4 years

19 years

27 years

Reason for Amputation

Cancer

Cancer

Trauma

Congenital

Trauma

Side of Amputation

Right transfemoral amputation

Left transfemoral amputation

Right knee disarticulation

Left transfemoral amputation

Right transfemoral amputation

Prescribed Prosthesis

Genium (Ottobock, 1.7 kg)

Genium (Ottobock, 1.7 kg)

Plie 3 (Freedom Innovations, 1.2 kg)

Rheo Knee (Ossur, 1.6 kg)

Power Knee (Ossur, 3.2 kg)

Time with Current Prosthesis

6 years

3 years

3 years

6 months

5 years

Physical Therapy Post-amputation

2 months

6 months

9 months

None

3 or more months

Suspension

Double-wall with pin to outer socket

Ischial containment suction

Shuttle lock, 3–5-ply socks, window socket with lanyard

Suction

Vacuum

Self-reported Functional K-level

3

3

3

4

3

Self-selected Walking Speed with Each Prosthesis

Prescribed: 0.8 m/s Powered: 0.8 m/s

Prescribed: 0.8 m/s Powered: 0.8 m/s

Prescribed: 0.9 m/s Powered: 0.7 m/s

Prescribed: 0.5 m/s Powered: 0.7 m/s

Powered (i.e. prescribed): 0.5 m/s

  1. The listed prescribed prosthesis for Subjects 1–4 are energetically-passive knee prostheses. Subject 5 wore a powered prosthesis daily and was only tested with the powered prosthesis