Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of participant characteristics, clinical scores and settings for LOPES II

From: Automatic versus manual tuning of robot-assisted gait training in people with neurological disorders

ID

Gender

Age

Time post stroke/SCI (years)

More affected leg

Level SCI

10MWT (km/h)

Assistive device(s) used during 10MWT

FAC

FMA

MI

Walking speed in LOPES II (km/h)

Toe-lifter in LOPES II

Str1

m

53

1

r

n.a.

1.9

cane, AFO

4

13

28

1.5

Yes

Str2

f

63

5

l

n.a.

2.1

cane

5

33

83

2.0

No

Str3

m

60

2

l

n.a.

2.4

cane, AFO

5

19

42

1.5

Yes

Str4

m

33

10

r

n.a.

3.1

none

5

25

67

1.4

No

Str5

m

74

4

r

n.a.

4.1

none

5

31

91

1.7

No

Str6

f

74

6

r

n.a.

3.0

none

5

24

58

1.5

No

SCI1

f

45

8

l

T9

2.8

walker

5

n.a.

n.a.

1.3

No

SCI2

m

25

3

l

L3

n.a.

n.a.

0

n.a.

n.a.

1.5

Yes

SCI3

m

63

6

r

T12

0.8

walker, AFO

3

n.a.

n.a.

1.0

Yes

SCI4

m

41

1

r

L3

2.9

none

5

n.a.

n.a.

2.0

No

  1. ID: identification code used for each specific participant, 10MWT: 10 meter walking test, FAC: functional ambulation scale, FMA: Fugl-Meyer assessment (lower extremity), MI: Motricity index (lower extremity), AFO: ankle foot orthosis, Str..: participants with stroke, SCI..: participants with SCI