Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality assessment scoring of 82 included studies

From: Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Information

Study Ques.

Study Design

Measurement

Analyses

Rec

Total

Author

Year

Ref

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Q10

Q11

Q12

/24

%

Abhayasinghe

2019

[20]

1

0

1

2

0

N/A

0

0

2

1

0

0

7

31.8%*

Al-Amri

2018

[21]

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

20

83.3%

Allseits

2018

[22]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

0

1

2

2

0

2

13

59.1%*

Allseits

2017

[23]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

2

0

2

15

68.2%*

Aminian

2004

[24]

1

0

0

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

1

0

1

10

45.5%*

Atallah

2014

[25]

2

1

2

2

0

N/A

0

1

2

2

1

0

13

59.1%*

Backhouse

2013

[26]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

2

0

1

13

59.1%*

Bautmans

2011

[27]

2

2

0

2

0

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

18

75.0%

Ben Mansour

2015

[28]

2

0

0

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

0

0

1

9

40.9%*

Benoussaad

2016

[29]

2

1

0

2

0

N/A

1

1

1

0

0

1

9

40.9%*

Bertoli

2018

[30]

2

1

0

2

1

N/A

2

2

2

2

0

2

16

72.7%*

Bolink

2016

[31]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

2

1

2

2

1

2

16

72.7%*

Bruijn

2010

[32]

2

0

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

1

1

1

1

12

54.5%*

Buganè

2012

[33]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

0

0

1

11

50.0%*

Byun

2016

[34]

2

2

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

1

2

1

16

72.7%*

Chalmers

2014

[35]

2

0

0

2

0

N/A

1

0

1

0

0

0

6

27.3%*

Chapman

2019

[36]

1

0

0

2

0

N/A

0

2

2

2

0

1

10

45.5%*

Charlton

2019

[37]

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

21

87.5%

Cole

2014

[38]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

2

1

2

15

68.2%*

Cooper

2009

[39]

2

1

0

2

0

N/A

0

2

1

0

0

0

8

36.4%*

Dalton

2013

[40]

2

1

0

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

1

1

2

13

59.1%*

Del Din

2016

[41]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

1

1

2

15

68.2%*

Esser

2009

[42]

0

0

1

2

0

N/A

1

0

1

1

1

1

8

36.4%*

Furrer

2015

[43]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

2

1

2

2

1

1

15

68.2%*

Godfrey

2015

[44]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

1

1

2

14

63.6%*

Gonzalez

2016

[45]

2

1

1

2

1

N/A

1

1

2

0

0

1

12

54.5%*

Gorelick

2009

[46]

2

1

1

2

0

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

18

75.0%

Greene

2012

[47]

2

1

2

2

0

N/A

2

2

2

1

0

0

14

63.6%*

Greene

2010

[48]

2

0

1

2

0

N/A

2

2

2

1

0

1

13

59.1%*

Hamacher

2014

[49]

1

0

1

1

0

2

1

0

2

2

1

1

12

50.0%

Hamacher

2015

[50]

2

0

1

1

0

2

0

0

2

2

2

2

14

58.3%

Hartmann

2009

[51]

2

2

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

2

1

2

17

77.3%*

Hartmann

2009

[52]

2

2

1

2

0

2

1

1

2

2

1

2

18

75.0%

Henriksen

2004

[53]

2

1

1

1

0

2

0

2

2

1

2

2

16

66.7%

Huang

2016

[54]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

0

0

2

13

59.1%*

Hundza

2014

[55]

2

0

0

2

0

N/A

1

0

2

0

0

2

9

40.9%*

Jarchi

2014

[56]

2

0

1

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

2

1

2

14

63.6%*

Karatsidis

2019

[57]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

2

0

2

1

1

2

14

63.6%*

Kavanagh

2006

[58]

2

1

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

19

79.2%

Kitagawa

2016

[59]

2

1

0

1

0

N/A

0

0

1

0

0

2

7

31.8%*

Kluge

2017

[60]

2

1

1

2

0

0

1

1

2

1

1

1

13

54.2%

Köse

2012

[61]

2

0

1

1

0

N/A

0

0

2

0

0

1

7

31.8%*

Lebel

2017

[62]

2

1

0

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

1

1

2

13

59.1%*

L’Hermette

2008

[63]

1

1

0

1

0

N/A

1

0

1

1

0

1

7

31.8%*

Liikavainio

2007

[64]

2

1

1

1

0

2

2

2

2

0

1

2

16

66.7%

Liu

2009

[65]

2

1

0

1

0

N/A

0

1

2

1

0

2

10

45.5%*

Lord

2008

[66]

0

0

1

2

0

N/A

0

0

2

1

2

1

9

40.9%*

Lyytinen

2016

[67]

2

1

0

2

0

2

1

2

2

1

1

2

16

66.7%

Maffiuletti

2008

[68]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

2

1

2

1

0

2

14

63.6%*

Manor

2018

[69]

2

2

1

2

0

2

0

0

1

1

1

2

14

58.3%

Mariani

2012

[70]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

2

0

2

14

63.6%*

Mariani

2013

[71]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

1

2

1

0

2

13

59.1%*

McGrath

2012

[72]

2

0

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

1

1

1

13

59.1%*

Moe-Nilssen

1998

[73]

2

0

0

1

0

2

1

1

2

2

1

2

14

58.3%

Nishiguchi

2012

[74]

2

1

0

0

0

2

1

1

2

1

1

1

12

50.0%

Ohtako

2001

[75]

2

0

0

2

0

N/A

0

1

1

1

0

2

9

40.9%*

Orlowski

2017

[76]

2

1

1

2

0

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

18

75.0%

Pepa

2017

[77]

2

0

1

2

0

N/A

0

2

2

2

0

1

12

54.5%*

Reynard

2014

[78]

2

2

1

1

0

2

1

0

2

2

2

2

17

70.8%

Sabatini

2015

[79]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

2

2

1

2

0

2

15

68.2%*

Saremi

2006

[80]

2

0

1

1

0

2

2

1

2

0

0

2

13

54.2%

Schmitz-Hübsch

2016

[81]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

0

1

2

2

0

1

12

54.5%*

Sejdic

2015

[82]

2

0

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

0

0

2

12

54.5%*

Selles

2005

[83]

2

1

0

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

1

1

1

13

59.1%*

Senden

2009

[84]

2

0

1

1

0

2

1

1

2

1

1

1

13

54.2%

Sijobert

2015

[85]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

0

0

0

11

50.0%*

Silsupadol

2017

[86]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

2

1

2

16

72.7%*

Steins

2014

[87]

1

0

1

1

0

N/A

1

0

2

2

2

1

11

50.0%*

Storm

2016

[88]

2

0

1

2

0

N/A

1

2

2

0

0

2

12

54.5%*

Teufl

2019

[89]

2

0

0

1

0

2

2

1

2

1

1

2

14

58.3%

Teufl

2018

[90]

2

1

1

1

0

2

2

0

2

1

2

2

16

66.7%

Trojaniello

2014

[91]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

1

0

2

0

0

1

10

45.5%*

Trojaniello

2014

[92]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

2

2

1

2

0

2

15

68.2%*

Trojaniello

2015

[93]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

2

2

2

0

0

2

14

63.6%*

van der Straaten

2018

[94]

2

2

1

2

0

2

1

0

2

2

2

2

18

75.0%

van Schooten

2013

[95]

2

0

1

2

0

2

1

0

2

2

1

2

15

62.5%

Washabaugh

2017

[96]

1

1

1

2

0

1

0

1

2

2

1

2

14

58.3%

Wundersitz

2015

[97]

2

1

1

2

0

N/A

0

2

2

2

1

1

14

63.6%*

Xia

2017

[98]

2

1

0

2

0

N/A

2

1

2

1

1

1

13

59.1%*

Zhang

2013

[99]

1

1

1

2

0

N/A

2

0

1

0

1

0

9

40.9%*

Zijlstra

2013

[100]

2

1

1

1

0

2

1

1

2

1

1

2

15

62.5%

Zijlstra

2003

[101]

2

1

0

1

0

N/A

0

1

1

0

0

1

7

31.8%*

  1. *Percentage calculated out of 22 as studies did not qualify for reliability and were not assessed on Q6 for sample retention