Skip to main content

Table 1 The p-values from statistical analyses

From: Time evolution of frontal plane dynamic balance during locomotor transitions of altered anticipation and complexity

 

PREPARATORY

TRANSITION

CORRECTION

COMPLETION

P1

P1-N1

N1

N1-P2

P2

P2-N2

N2

ANOVA main effects

 Anticipation

0.012

0.02

0

–

0*

0*

0*

 Cutting Style

0*

0.001

0

0*

0*

0*

0*

 Complexity

–

–

0.022

0*

0*

0*

0*

ANOVA interaction effects

 Anticipation * Cutting Style

0*

0*

0.026

–

–

–

–

 Anticipation * Complexity

–

–

–

–

0.011

0

0.005

 Cutting Style * Complexity

–

0.003

0*

–

0*

–

0*

 Anticipation * Cutting Style * Complexity

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Pairwise comparisons

Anticipation

Cut Style

Complexity

       

Anticipated

X

(X)

0*

–

–

 

−0.01

(−)

(−)

Unanticipated

X

(X)

–

0*

0

 

(0*)

(0*)

(0*)

 X

Crossover

(X)

0*

−0.037

−0.015

 

(0*)

 

(−)

 X

Sidestep

(X)

0

0* (−)

0.001 (−)

 

(−)

 

(0*)

 X

(X)

Cut

 

0

−0.017

 

- (0*)

–

0.021 (0.020)

 X

(X)

Cut/Stairs

 

(−)

(−)

 

0 (0*)

0*

0* (0*)

  1. The p-values from statistical analyses of maxima (P1, P2), minima (N1, N2) and average rate of change (P1-N1, N1-P2, P2-N2) of normalized frontal-plane H during four phases are shown. Main, interaction effects of ANOVA and pairwise comparison results with p < 0.0005 (0.0001) are listed as 0 (0*), and “-” denotes results that were not significant. Pairwise comparisons were only performed when interaction effects were significant, and “X”, “(X)” indicate comparisons between different levels of the associated main factors
Back to article page

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

ISSN: 1743-0003

Contact us