Table 4 Average results for Amputee Subjects using SH2-P, and comparison with the SH-P (data from [28]), the Hosmer 5XA body-powered hook and the Motion Control Electric Device (data from [51]), the Switch-Controlled hand and the Ottobock 8E44 DMC Plus (data from [53]), the Michelangelo Hand controlled with Direct Control and Pattern Recognition Control (data from [52])
From: Exploring augmented grasping capabilities in a multi-synergistic soft bionic hand
Terminal Device | Control Method | BBT | JTT |
|---|---|---|---|
SH2-P | Myoelectric Cont. PR (8 sEMG sensors) | 10.67 ±2.3 | 290.75 ±33.7 |
SH-P [28] | Myoelectric DC (2 sEMG sensors) | 9.6 ±1.4 | 327.46 ±22.8 |
Hosmer 5XA Hook [51] | Body-Powered Harness | 49 | NA |
Motion Control Electric Device [51] | Myoelectric DC (2 sEMG sensors) | 20 | NA |
1 DoF Hand [53] | Switch-Controlled (humeral abduction) | 6 | 621 |
Ottobock 8E44 DMC Plus [53] | Myoelectric DC (2 sEMG sensors) | 2 / 8 ◇ | 769/567 ◇ |
Michelangelo Hand [52] | Myoelectric DC (2 sEMG sensors) | 14.7 ±9/8.7 ±5.5 ◇◇ | 362 ±135.1/331 ±52.1 ◇◇ |
Myoelectric PR (6 sEMG sensors) | 5.7 ±1.2/11 ±6.1 ◇◇ | 346.3 ±77.7/332.3 ±69.3 ◇◇ |