Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies and outcomes

From: Perseverance with technology-facilitated home-based upper limb practice after stroke: a systematic mixed studies review

Author

(Year)

Country

Study design

Participants

Intervention

Qualitative perseverance data collection and outcomes

Quantitative perseverance data collection and outcomes

Data collection method

Stage of perseverance

Surrogate measures

Outcomes for surrogate measures

Measures of factors

Outcomes for measures of factors

1

2

3

SS

CS

Other

Qualitative

Donoso-Brown (2015)

USA [10]

Qualitative

descriptive

n = 10a

10 stroke survivors

56.3 (44–69) years

6M:4F

Chronic

NGT

45 min/session

1 session/day

5 days/week

4 weeks

Semi-structured

interviews

X

X

X

 

Emmerson (2018)

Australia [39]

Phenomenology

n = 10b

10 stroke survivors

2 family members

72 (51–85) years

10M:0F

Early Subacute-Chronic

iPad

Dose variable

4 weeks

In-depth

semi-

structured

interviews

X

X

X

 

O’Brien Cherry (2017)

USA [52]

Ethnography

n = 10c

10 stroke survivors

Unknown number of family members

62.2 (49–88) years

10M:0F

Early Subacute-Chronic

HandMentor Pro™

1-2hrs/day

 ≥ 1 session/day

7 days/week

12 weeks

Observation,

in-depth

semi-

structured

interviews

X

X

X

 

Parker (2014)

UK [54]

Realistic

evaluation

n = 5

5 stroke survivors

5 family members

71 (62–79) years

4M:1F

Late Subacute-Chronic

SMART System

Sessions/day not

reported

Days/week not

reported

5 weeks

Observation,

interviews,

diary

X

X

 

 

Sivan (2016)

UK [59]

Specific

qualitative

methodology

not reported

n = 17d

17 stroke survivors

7 therapists

56.4 years

14M:3F

Chronic

hCAAR

30 min/session

1 session/day

5 days/week

8 weeks

Semi-

structured

interviews

X

X

X

 

Wingham (2015)

UK [65]

Specific

qualitative

methodology

not reported

n = 18e

18 stroke survivors

10 family members

65 (35–84) years

11M:7F stroke survivors

8M:2F family members

Early Subacute-Chronic

Nintendo Wii Sports™

45 min/session

1 session/day

7 days/week

6 weeks

Semi-

structured

interviews

X

X

X

 

Quantitative

Adie (2017)

UK [28]

RCT

n = 235 (E 117, C 118)e

E 66.8 (SD 14.6), C 68.0

(SD 11.9) years

E 66M:51F, C 65M:53F

Acute-Chronic

Nintendo Wii Sports™

45 min/session

1 session/day

7 days/week

6 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

82%T

Desire not to continue (3); Medically deteriorated

(4); Unable to contact (4)

Incomplete

data (4)

ARAT

COPM

EQ-5D-3L

MAL

SIS

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

Y

Y

N

U

U

 

Basteris (2015)

Netherlands, Italy [30]

Case Series

n = 7f

53.7 (34–66) years

5M:2F

Chronic

SCRIPT*

30 min/session

1 session/day

6 days/week

6 weeks

 

X

 

Adherence

50%T

 

Bernocchi (2018)

Italy [31]

Case Series

n = 21

69 (62–75) years

14M:7F

Early Subacute- Chronic

Glorhea Lite™

45 min/session

1 session/day

6 days/week

8 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

79%T

Death (1)

Medically

deteriorated

(1); Nursing home admission (1); Desire not to continue (1)

BI

Grip strength

mAS

Motricity Index

NHPT

Pain VAS

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

N

U

U

U

U

U

U

 

Brokaw (2015)

USA [33]

Case Study

n = 1

49 years

F

Chronic

HAMSTER,

HandSOME

30 min/session

1 session/day

5 days/week

4 weeks

X

  

Adherence

95%S

FMA

JHFT

SIS-16

NT

NT

NT

N

U

N

 

Buick (2016)

Canada, Ireland [34]

Case Series

n = 11

64.18 (54–86) years

10M:1F

Chronic

ReJoyce and FES-ET

60 min/session

1 session/day

5 days/week

6 weeks

 

X

 

Dropouts

Failed to

complete

intervention

(1)

ARAT

Y

N

 

PIADS

Moderate positive

impact on

measures of

competence

(+ 1.01)

adaptability (+ 1.1)

Slight positive impact on self-esteem (+ 0.46)

Burdea (2019)

USA [35]

Case Series

n = 7

7 stroke survivors

7 caregivers

64.14 (48–79) stroke

survivors

60.29 (27–74) caregivers

4M:3F stroke survivors

5M:2F caregivers

Chronic

BrightBrainer

20–40 min/

session

1 session/day

5 days/week

4 weeks

X

 

X

Adherence

105%T

CAHAI

Y

N

 

Caregiver feedback survey

Nil scores > 4/5

FMA

N

N

 

Grip strength

Y

U

 

JHFT

N

U

 

Pinch strength

N

U

 

Stroke survivor feedback survey

Score > 4/5 for: useful instruction, decreased boredom, encouraging others to use the device, liking the system overall

UEFI

N

Y

 

UL ROM

N

U

 

Butler (2014)

USA [36]

Case Series

n = 13 (UL 9)c

59.7 (41–74) years

12M:1F

Early Subacute-Chronic

HandMentor Pro™

1–2hrs/session

 ≥ 1 session/day

7 days/week

12 weeks

X

X

X

Adherence

Dropouts

13%T

Unknown (1)

ARAT

Y

Y

 

FIM-C

N

N

 

FIM-M

Y

N

 

Satisfaction Survey

‘high’ satisfaction

Donoso-Brown (2014)

USA [37]

Interrupted time

series with non-

parallel control

n = 12a

60 (47–69) years

5M:4F

Chronic

NGT

45min/session

1 session/day

5 days/week

4 weeks

 

X

X

Adherence

Dropouts

79%T

Medically

deteriorated

(1); Lack of time

(2)

CAHAI

N

N

 

ROM

N

U

sEMG-Game Play

N

U

sEMG-Lab Assessment

Y

U

WMFT

N

N

Emmerson (2017)

Australia [38]

RCT

n = 62 (E 30, C 32)b

E 68 (SD 15), C 63 (SD 18) years

E 17M:13F, C 19M:13F

Early Subacute-Chronic

iPad

Dose variable

4 weeks

  

X

Adherence

Dropouts

62%G

Death (1); Good progress (3)

Grip Strength

NT

N

 

Satisfaction Survey

E 71%, C 67%

WMFT-Quality

NT

N

 

WMFT-Time

NT

N

 

Fluet (2019)

USA [40]

RCT

n = 11 (E 5, C 6)

E 58 (SD9), C 65 (SD

15) years

M:F not reported

Time since stroke not

reported

HoVRS*

20 min/session

 ≥ 1 session/day

7 days/week

12 weeks

 

X

 

Adherence

68%T

BBT

NT

U

 

FMA

NT

U

 

IMI

E participants (n = 5) scored higher than C participants (n = 3) at pre- and post-intervention overall, and on interest/ enjoyment subscales

Housley (2016)

USA [43]

Case Series

n = 20 (UL 10)

67(± 11.4) years

19M:1F

Early Subacute-Chronic

HandMentor Pro™

1-2hrs/session

 ≥ 1 session/day

7 days/week

12 weeks

X

X

X

Adherence

Dropouts

79%T

Medically

deteriorated

(1)

ARAT

Y

Y

 

FIM-Total

N

N

 

Satisfaction Survey

‘high’ satisfaction

Jordan (2014)

NZ [44]

Interrupted time

series with non-

parallel control

n = 13

68.6 (56.3–79.6) years

M:F not reported

Chronic

Smart Skate

45–60 min/

session

1 session/day

3–5 days/week

4–6 weeks

X

  

Dropouts

Personal

reasons (1)

FMA

Y

N

 

IMI

Average 6.12/7

Strength

Y

U

 

King (2012)

NZ [45]

Case Series

n = 3

56.3 (47–65) years

2M:1F

Chronic

CyWee Z

Participant selected

dose

8 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

100%G

DASH

NT

U

 

FMA

NT

N

 

IMI

Interest/ enjoyment: 31.33/49

Perceived choice: 18.33/49

Perceived competence: 28/42

Value/usefulness: 43.33/49

Effort/importance: 20.66/35

Langan (2013)

USA [46]

Case Series

n = 7

56 (47–63) years

5M:2F

Chronic

Stereognosis Training System

60 min/session

1 session/day

5 days/week

6 weeks

 

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

90%G

Unknown (1)

Kinematics

Y

U

 

Proprioception – Joint Movement

N

U

Proprioception – Tactile Discrimination

N

U

WMFT

NT

U

Lin (2013)

USA [47]

Case Series

n = 2

52.5 (48–57) years

0M:2F

Chronic

Looking Glass

60 min/session

1 session/day

7 days/week

X

X

 

Adherence

71%S

ARAT

COPM

MAL

ROM

NT

NT

NT

NT

Y

Y

U

U

 

Linder (2013)

USA [48]

Case Study

n = 1

54 years

M

Late Subacute

HandMentor Pro™

3 hrs/day (2hours

HMP, 1hour HEP)

5 days/week

8 weeks

X

X

X

Adherence

56%T

ARAT

NT

Y

 

FMA

NT

Y

SIS-ADL

NT

Y

SIS-Hand Function

NT

N

SIS-Mobility

NT

Y

SIS-Strength

NT

N

WMFT-Time

NT

Y

WMFT- Quality

NT

Y

Linder (2015)

USA [49]

RCT

n = 99 (E 51, C 48)g

E 59.4(SD 13.6), C 55.5 (SD 12.6) years

E 31M:20F, C 33M:15F

Late Subacute

HandMentor Pro™

3 hrs/day (2hours

HMP, 1hour HEP)

5 days/week

8 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

112%T

Unknown (8)

SIS-ADL

Y

Y

 

SIS-Hand Function

Y

Y

SIS-Mobility

Y

Y

SIS-Strength

Y

Y

Nijenhuis (2015)

Netherlands, Italy, UK [50]

Case Series

n = 24f

59 (34–80) years

10M:11F

Chronic

SCRIPT*

30 min/session

1 session/day

6 days/week

6 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

58%T

Shoulder

pain (1); Technical

issues (1); Desire not to

continue (1)

ARAT

N

N

 

FMA

Y

N

 

IMI

5.2 (SD 0.9)

MAL

N

N

 

SIS-ADL

N

N

 

SIS-Hand Function

N

N

 

SIS-Mobility

Y

N

 

SIS-Strength

Y

Y

 

SUS

69% (SD 17)

Nijenhuis (2017)

Netherlands [51]

RCT

n = 20 (E 10, C 10)

E 58 (48–65), C62 (54–

70) years

E 7M:2F; C 3M:7F

Chronic

SCRIPT

30 min/session

1 session/day

6 days/week

6 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

66%T

Shoulder

pain (1)

ARAT

N

N

 

BBT

N

N

 

FMA

N

N

 

Grip Strength

N

N

 

IMI

E 5.4, C 4.9

MAL

N

N

 

SIS-Overall

N

N

 

Pareto (2011)

Sweden [53]

Case Series

n = 3

83 (78–87) years

3M:0F

Late Subacute-Chronic

Curictus Immersive

Workbench

20 min/session

1 session/day

7 days/week

12–21 weeks

X

  

Adherence

18%T

ARAT

BBT

EQ-5D-3L

Grip Strength

NT

NT

NT

NT

Y

U

Y

U

 

Rand (2015)

Israel [57]

RCT

n = 24 (E 13, C 11)h

E 59.1 (33–75), C 64.9

(58–80) years

E 9M:4F, C 6M:5F

Chronic

Microsoft X-box

Kinect™ Playstation 2 Eyetoy™

60 min/session

1 session/day

6 days/week

5 weeks

 

X

X

Adherence

Dropouts

63%T

Personal

reasons (2); Desire not to

continue (2)

ARAT

BBT

MAL

Y

Y

Y

N

U

N

 

Sivan (2014)

UK [58]

Case Series

n = 17d

56.4 (SD 11.5) years

14M:3F

Chronic

hCAAR

30 min/session

1 session/day

5 days/week

8 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

43%T

Inadequate

space (1); Unable to

use technology

(1)

ABILHAND Questionnaire

Y

U

 

ARAT

Y

N

CAHAI

Y

Y

FMA

Y

N

mAS

Y

U

Reaching

Y

U

Strength

Y

U

Slijper (2014)

Sweden [60]

Case Series

n = 12

58 (26–66) years

5M:6F

Chronic

Gaming Console

Participant selected

dose

5 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

100%O

Medically

deteriorated

(1)

ABILHAND Questionnaire

N

Y

 

ARAT

Y

Y

FMA

Y

Y

Grip Strength

Y

U

Standen (2017)

UK [62]

RCT Feasibility

n = 27 (E 17, C 10)i

E 59 (SD 12.03), C 63

(SD 14.06) years

E 8M:9F, C 8M:2F

Early Subacute-Chronic

Virtual Glove

20 min/session

3 sessions/day

7 days/week

8 weeks

X

X

X

Dropouts

Medically

deteriorated

(2); Desire not to

continue (1); Family

commitment

(2)

MAL

NEADL

NHPT

WMFT

Y

N

N

N

Y

U

U

N

 

Thielbar (2020)

USA [64]

Randomised

Crossover

Trial

n = 20 (First SU 10, First MU 10)

First SU 59.7 (SD 10.5) years

First MU 59.8 (SD 4.8) years

First SU 8M:2F, First MU 9M:1F

Chronic

VERGE

60 min/session

1 session/day

4 days/week

4 weeks

 

X

 

Adherence

84%G

FMA

Y

N

 

IMI

Value/usefulness: 6.6/7

Effort/importance: 6.4/7

Interest/enjoyment: > 5.5/7

Perceived competence: > 5.5/7

Wittmann (2016)

Switzerland [66]

Case Series

n = 11

60 (42–73) years

5M:6F

Late Subacute–Chronic

ArmeoSenso System

Participant selected

dose

6 weeks

X

X

X

Adherence

100%G

Automated Reaching Assessment

Y

U

 

FMA

Y

N

ROM

N

U

WMFT

N

Y

Wolf (2015)

USA [67]

RCT

n = 99 (E 51, C 48)g

E 59.1 (SD 12.2), C 54.7 (SD 14.1) years

E 25M:26F, C 31M:17F

Early Subacute-Late

Subacute

HandMentor Pro™

3 hrs/day (C 3 hours HEP; E 2 hours HMP,

1 hour HEP)

5 days/week

8 weeks

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

112%T

Medically

deteriorated

(1); Poor

adherence

(1); Desire not to

continue (1)

Moved onto

other

therapy (1); Incomplete

data (3)

ARAT

Y

N

 

FMA

Y

Y

WMFT-Quality

Y

N

WMFT-Time

Y

N

Yacoby (2019)

Israel [68]

RCT

n = 24 (E 13, C 11)h

E 59.1 (33–74), C 64.9

(58–80) years

E 9M:4F, C 6M:5F

Chronic

Microsoft Kinect™ or Sony EyeToy™

60 min/session

1 session/day

6 days/week

5 weeks

X

X

X

Adherence

Dropouts

63%T

Personal

reasons (2);

Desire not to

continue (2)

Perceived enjoyment

4.1/5

Perceived exertion

11.8/20

Perceived UL improvement

5/13 participants

Satisfaction

3.9/5

Mixed methods

Alankus (2010)

USA [29]

QL: Case Study

QT: Case Study

n = 1j

62 years

F

Chronic

Looking Glass

60–75 min/

session

 ≥ 1 session/day

5 days/week

6 weeks

Semi-

structured

in-depth

interviews

X

 

X

Adherence

101%T

ARAT

NT

N

 

RPS

NT

U

Bhattacharjya (2019)

USA [32]

QL: Specific

qualitative

methodology

not reported

QT: Case Series

n = 2

Age not reported

M:F not reported

Time since stroke not

reported

mRehab*

120 reps

 ≥ 1 session/day

5 days/week

6 weeks

Interview

X

X

 

Adherence

75%S

 

Fu (2019)

USA [41]

QT: Case Series

QL: Specific

qualitative

methodology

not reported

n = 7

59.42 (40–77) years

4M:3F

Chronic

CCFES

45 min/session

2 sessions/day

6 days/week

12 weeks

Participant

journals

Interview

X

X

X

Adherence

Dropouts

110%T

Poor

adherence

(1); Medically

deteriorated

(1); Other

commitment

(2)

AMAT

FMA

NT

NT

U

N

 

Hayward (2015)

Australia [42]

QL: Specific

qualitative

methodology

not reported

QT: Case Study

n = 1

1 stroke survivor

1 caregiver

57 years

M

Chronic

SMART Arm

60–80 reps/session

 ≥ 1 session/day

5 days/week

4 weeks

Observation,

researcher

and

participant

journals

X

X

X

Adherence

140%R

MAL

NT

Y

 

mAS

NT

U

MAS

NT

U

Ritchie Articular Index

NT

U

SIS

NT

U

Strength

NT

U

Tardieu Scale

NT

U

Proffitt (2011)

USA [55]

QL: Specific

methodology

not reported

QT: Case Study

n = 1j

62 years

F

Chronic

Looking Glass

60–75 min/ session

1 session/day

5 days/week

6 weeks

Observation,

semi-

structured

interviews,

participant

journal

 

X

X

Adherence

100%G

ACS

ARAT

ROM

RPS

NT

NT

NT

NT

U

N

U

U

 

Proffitt (2015)

USA [56]

QL: Grounded

Theory

QT: Case Series

n = 4

57.25 (54–64) years

2M:2F

Chronic

Mystic Isle

4 hrs/week

6 weeks

Semi-

structured

interviews

 

X

 

Adherence

63%T

COPM

NT

N

 

FMA

NT

N

 

SS-QOL

NT

U

 

SUS

2.70/5

Standen

(2015)

UK [61]

QL: Specific

methodology

not reported

QT: Prospective

Cohort Study

n = 13i

59 (40–82) years

5M:8F

Early Subacute-Chronic

Virtual Glove

20 min/session

3 sessions/day

7 days/week

8 weeks

Interviews

X

X

X

Adherence

Dropouts

17%T

Medically

deteriorated

(2); Family

commitment

(2)

 

Szturm (2020)

Canada [63]

QL: Qualitative

Descriptive

QT: Case Series

n = 10

58 (SD 12) years

6M:4F

Late Subacute-Chronic

GTP

20 min/session

1 session/day

4 sessions/week

16 weeks

Semi-

structured

interviews

X

X

 

Adherence

Dropouts

100%T

Unable to

use technology

(2)

Grip Strength

NT

N

 

Movement onset time – movement variance

NT

U

Object manipulation – average

NT

U

Object manipulation – success rate

NT

U

WMFT – Quality

NT

Y

WMFT – Time

NT

Y

  1. “Outcomes for measures of factors” within experimental group
  2. *Participants self-selected dose; a−jSample duplication; Adherence based on: GGeneral adherence reported; Rreps/time on task; Snumber of sessions; Ttime in therapy
  3. ACS Activity Card Sort, Acute—1–7 days post stroke, AMES Assisted Movement With Enhanced Sensation, ARAT Action Research Arm Test, BBT Box and Block Test, BI Barthel Index, C Control, CAHAI Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory, CCFES Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation, Chronic  > 6 months post-stroke, COPM Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, CS Clinically Significant Change, DASH Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, E Experimental, Early Subacute 7 days–3 months post-stroke, EQ-5D-3L EuroQual Health State Record, F Female, FIM Functional Independence Measure, FMA Fugl-Meyer Assessment, hCAAR Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation, GTP Game-assisted Telerehabilitation Platform, HAMSTER Home Arm Movement Stroke Training Environment, HandSOME Hand Spring Operated Movement Enhancer, Hyper-acute 0-24hours post-stroke, IMI Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, JHFT Jebsen Hand Function Test, Late Subacute 3-6 months post-stroke, M Male, MAL Motor Activity Log, mAS Modified Ashworth Scale, MAS –Motor Assessment Scale, mRehab Mobile Rehabilitation, MU Multi-user, N No, NEADL Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale, NGT NeuroGame Therapy, NHPT Nine Hole Peg Test, NT Statistical Significance Not Tested, P Participant, PIADS Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale, QL Qualitative, QT Quantitative, ReJoyce The Rehabilitation Joystick for Arm and Hand Exercises, RCT Randomised Controlled Trial, ROM Range of Motion, RPS Reaching Performance Scale, SCRIPT Supervised Care and Rehabilitation Involving Personal Telerobotics, SD Standard Deviation;. sEMG Surface Electromyography, SIS Stroke Impact Scale, SMART Arm Sensorimotor Active Rehabilitation Training of the Arm, SS Statistically Significant Change, SS-QOL Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale, SU Single-user, SUS System Usability Scale, U unable to determine CS (no MCID, insufficient data), VERGE Virtual Environment for Rehabilitative Gaming Exercises, WMFT Wolf Motor Function Test, Y Yes