Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluated temporal gait parameters and reported results of the included studies

From: Effect of robotic-assisted gait training on objective biomechanical measures of gait in persons post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Type of outcome

Velocity during assessment

Parameter

Bang 2016

Buesing 2015

Calabró 2018

Geroin 2011

Hidler 2009

Hornby 2008

Husemann 2007

Ogino 2020

Lee 2019

Lewek 2009

Srivastava 2016

Tanaka 2019

Westlake 2009

Temporal parameters

SSV

Gait speed

R^ (p = .00)

X

   

C (p = .03)

 

NR

R (p = .00)

C

X

 

X

 

Cadence

R^ (p = .00)

X

R (p = .00)

 

X

   

R (p = .00)

X

   
 

Stride/Gait cycle duration

  

R (p = .00)

          
 

Step time

 

X

           
 

Stance time

 

X

     

NR

     
 

Swing time

 

X

     

NR

     
 

Single limb stance time

     

X

       
 

Double support time

R^ (p = .01)

X

     

NR

     

FV

Gait speed

 

X

   

C (p = .02)

X

    

R (p = .01)

X

 

Cadence

 

X

 

R (p = .00)

  

X

    

X

 
 

Stride/Gait cycle duration

      

X

      
 

Step time

 

X

           
 

Stance time

 

X

    

X

      
 

Swing time

 

X

           
 

Single limb stance time

     

C (p = .00)

X

      
 

Double support time

 

X

           
  1. X = No differences between groups; R = Significant difference between groups favouring robotic-assisted gait training; C = Significant difference between groups favouring the comparator  group (non-robotic gait training); NR = No reporting of between-group analyses; SSV = Self Selected Velocity; FV = Fastest Velocity
  2. ^Velocity not specified in the study