Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant demographics

From: Using a microprocessor knee (C-Leg) with appropriate foot transitioned individuals with dysvascular transfemoral amputations to higher performance levels: a longitudinal randomized clinical trial

SubID

Sex

Age (years)

Height (cm)

Weight (kg)

Etiology

Time since Amp. (years)

Predicate NMPK

Predicate foot

Assistive device

Rand. Ord

P1

F

76

165

72

Circulation problems

3

OWW GeoFlex

Ossur K2 sensation

Rolling walker

0

P2

M

57

173

61

Circulation problems

4

Ossur Mauch SNS

Ossur flex foot assure

None

1

P3

F

54

157

92

DM/circulation problems

1

Ossur total knee

Ossur variflex LP

Bilateral St. Cane/rolling walker

0

P4

F

52

175

70

Circulation problems

28

Ottobock 3R49 (Wt. activated Stance Control)

Trulife seattle lightfoot

None

1

P5

M

61

175

63

HT/circulation problems

2

Ossur Total Knee 2000

OWW SACH

Quad cane

1

P6

F

69

160

63

DM/HT/CAD

3

Rolling walker

1

P7

M

69

170

84

DM/HT/CAD

8

Hydraulic

Rolling walker

0

P8

F

72

152

59

Circulation problems

5

WASC

CPI accent

Rolling walker

0

P9

F

54

163

77

Circulation problems

1

Ossur total knee 1900

Freedom WalkTek

Rolling walker

1

P10

M

70

175

66

Circulation problems

3

Ossur total knee

Ottobock

Rolling walker/crutches

1

  1. DM = diabetes mellitus; HT = hypertension; CAD = coronary artery disease; Rand. Ord = 0–> CLeg then MK (Block 1); Rnd. Ord = 1–> MK then CLeg (Block 2); – = Information unavailable/Not provided