Skip to main content

Table 1 Single-DOF isometric strength data for each group and sex

From: Coupling of shoulder joint torques in individuals with chronic stroke mirrors controls, with additional non-load-dependent negative effects in a combined-torque task

 

AB

AD

ER

IR

Female

 Control

39.6 (1.3)

38.9 (1.5)

19.4 (1.7)

16.6 (1.1)

 Control, model

37.6

43.5

22.1

18.7

 Non-paretic

25.8 (3.6)

28.7 (3.5)

16.7 (1.7)

14.7 (2.3)

 Paretic

16.3 (2.0)

19.5 (2.6)

4.6 (1.0)

7.8 (1.1)

 Paretic, model

16.5

21.6

6.8

9.2

 NP/C ratio

0.65

0.74

0.86

0.88

 P/NP ratio

0.63

0.68

0.28

0.53

 P/C ratio

0.41

0.50

0.24

0.47

Male

 Control

66.4 (8.6)

66.8 (6.9)

38.2 (4.9)

33.6 (3.2)

 Control, model

58.4

64.1

33.2

30.8

 Non-paretic

57.7 (4.9)

59.1 (6.9)

35.8 (3.3)

32.0 (3.4)

 Paretic

28.1 (2.9)

30.6 (5.0)

10.3 (2.4)

12.3 (2.2)

 Paretic, model

26.2

31.7

11.0

13.9

 NP/C ratio

0.87

0.89

0.94

0.95

 P/NP ratio

0.49

0.52

0.29

0.38

 P/C ratio

0.42

0.46

0.27

0.37

Combined

 Control

53.0 (5.8)

52.8 (5.4)

28.8 (3.8)

25.1 (3.0)

 Non-paretic

41.8 (5.6)

43.9 (5.9)

26.3 (3.4)

23.4 (3.3)

 Paretic

22.2 (2.1)

25.0 (3.0)

7.5 (1.5)

10.1 (1.0)

 NP/C ratio

0.79

0.83

0.91

0.93

 P/NP ratio

0.53

0.57

0.28

0.43

 P/C ratio

0.42

0.47

0.26

0.40

  1. Strength data presented as group mean (standard error), Nm. Model data presented as the single-DOF maximum torque output from the optimization (Nm). Ratios presented are of group averages
  2. AB abduction, AD adduction, ER external rotation, IR internal rotation, C control, NP non-paretic, P paretic