Skip to main content

Table 8 Satisfaction with the current prosthesis

From: Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses

Variable

Overall

NMPK

MPK

p

f

Median (IQR)*

Satisfaction rating

Comfort*

5.0 (2)

4.0 (1)

5.0 (1)

 < 0.001

0.696

  Donning and doffing

5.0 (2)

4.0 (2.25)

5.0 (1)

0.008

0.642

  Weight

4.0 (2)

4.0 (2)

4.0 (1)

0.081

0.585

  Noisiness

6.0 (1)

5.0 (2)

6.0 (1)

 < 0.001

0.678

Aesthetic aspects*

5.0 (2)

4.0 (1.5)

5.0 (1.5)

 < 0.001

0.694

  General appearance

5.0 (2)

4.0 (2)

5.0 (2)

 < 0.001

0.684

  Size/dimensions relative to body

5.0 (2)

4.0 (2)

5.0 (2)

0.002

0.679

Functionality*

4.5 (1.5)

4.0 (2.25)

5.0 (1.5)

 < 0.001

0.792

  Gait

5.0 (2)

5.0 (1)

5.0 (1)

 < 0.001

0.752

  Gait on irregular surfaces

4.0 (2)

4.0 (2)

5.0 (2)

 < 0.001

0.747

  Stair ascent

3.0 (2)

3.0 (2)

3 (2.25)

0.675

0.528

  Stair Descent

5.0 (3)

3.0 (3)

5.0 (2)

 < 0.001

0.771

  Stand-to-sit transitions

4.0 (3)

4.0 (2)

5.0 (2)

0.004

0.665

  Sit-to-stand transitions

4.0 (2)

4.0 (2)

5.0 (2)

0.015

0.642

  Ascent of gradual incline (ramp)

4.0 (2)

4.0 (1.75)

5.0 (2.25)

 < 0.001

0.713

  Descent of gradual decline (ramp)

5.0 (2)

4.0 (3)

5.0 (1)

 < 0.001

0.782

  Ascent of steep incline (ramp)

3.0 (2)

3.0 (2.75)

4.0 (3)

0.001

0.667

  Descent of steep decline (ramp)

4.0 (3)

3.0 (3)

5.0 (2)

 < 0.001

0.806

  Getting in and out of automobile

4.5 (2)

4.0 (3)

5.0 (3)

0.906

0.638

  Maneuvering in tight spaces

4.0 (3)

3.0 (2)

4.5 (2)

0.681

0.695

 General Characteristics & Maintenance*

5.0 (2)

5.0 (1.0)

5.5 (1)

0.003

0.665

  Cleanability

5.0 (2)

4.0 (2)

6.0 (1)

0.002

0.671

  Robustness

5.0 (2)

5.0 (1.5)

5.0 (1)

0.018

0.627

  Water Resistance

3.0 (4)

3.0 (4)

3.0 (4)

0.353

0.524

  Reliability

5.0 (2)

5.0 (2)

5.0 (1)

0.012

0.617

  Battery autonomy

5.0 (2)

N/A

5.0 (2)

N/A

N/A

  Battery charging time

6.0 (1)

N/A

6.0 (1)

N/A

N/A

  1. *Aggregate median (IQR) values for each category computed as the median and IQR of each subject’s median satisfaction across constituent questions. Statistical significance (p) computed using Mann–Whitney U test, with common language effect size (f). Significant differences highlighted in bold