Visual feedback improves movement illusions induced by tendon vibration after chronic stroke

Table 1 Clinical description of the participants

	Sex	Age	Time since stroke	Stroke	Side	FMA-UE	Sensibility	Spasticity
P1	M	63	483	I	R	58	N	N
P2	F	54	773	H	L	14	SN	Y*
P3	M	40	223	H	L	50	S	N
P4	F	61	3656	H	R	16	S	Y*
P5	F	40	303	I	L	47	SN	Y
P6	M	56	1040	I	R	53	SN	N
P7	M	47	896	H	L	56	S	Y
P8	M	59	837	H	R	59	S	Y
P9	M	41	1378	H	R	60	S	N
P10	M	66	1979	I	L	8	N	Y*
P11	M	68	315	I	L	49	SN	N
P12	M	52	403	H	L	26	M	Y*
P13	M	78	2122	I	L	6	SN	Y*
P14	M	35	2854	H	R	31	S	Y*
P15	M	69	837	I	L	49	M	N
P16	M	65	320	H	R	22	SN	Y
P17	F	69	1354	H	L	5	M	Y*
P18	M	74	437	I	R	43	M	N
P19	F	67	1122	I	R	60	M	N
P20	F	70	370	I	L	8	M	Y

M male, F female, I ischemic, H hemorrhagic, Age in years old, Time since stroke in days. Stroke side: R right hemisphere, L left hemisphere
FMA-UE Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity, motor item (66 points)
Sensibility item: N normal, SN subnormal, M moderate disorder, S severe disorder
Spasticity item: N no, Y yes, * = severe spasticity with joint deformation

ISSN: 1743-0003