Skip to main content

Table 4 Spearman’s rho correlations (r(s)) between Session 1—Session 6 changes in quantitative measures extracted from motion tracking and pre-post BOT-2 and DCCS scores

From: Feasibility of a virtual reality-based exercise intervention and low-cost motion tracking method for estimation of motor proficiency in youth with autism spectrum disorder

  Efficiency Synchrony Symmetry
K1 K2 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 M1 M2 M3 M4
BOT-2 0.36 (0.27) 0.82 (0.02) 0.36 (0.25) 0.82 (0.03) 0.67 (0.035) 0.10 (0.42) 0.67 (0.039) 0.57 (0.033) 0.47 (0.04) 0.10 (0.44) 0.40 (0.25)
DCCS 0.04 (0.6) 0.08 (0.7) 0.04 (0.7) 0.20 (0.3) 0.20 (0.4) 0.08 (0.6) 0.20 (0.5) 0.01 (0.8) 0.40 (0.3) 0.08 (0.6) 0.01 (0.8)
  1. BOT-2 Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition, Gross Motor Proficiency; DCCS NIH toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test; K1-K2, H1-H5, and M1-M4 are described in detail in Table 2. Boldfaced correlations are significant (p < .05). p-values in parentheses