Skip to main content

Table 4 Spearman’s rho correlations (r(s)) between Session 1—Session 6 changes in quantitative measures extracted from motion tracking and pre-post BOT-2 and DCCS scores

From: Feasibility of a virtual reality-based exercise intervention and low-cost motion tracking method for estimation of motor proficiency in youth with autism spectrum disorder

 

Efficiency

Synchrony

Symmetry

K1

K2

H1

H2

H3

H4

H5

M1

M2

M3

M4

BOT-2

0.36 (0.27)

0.82 (0.02)

0.36 (0.25)

0.82 (0.03)

0.67 (0.035)

0.10 (0.42)

0.67 (0.039)

0.57 (0.033)

0.47 (0.04)

0.10 (0.44)

0.40 (0.25)

DCCS

0.04 (0.6)

0.08 (0.7)

0.04 (0.7)

0.20 (0.3)

0.20 (0.4)

0.08 (0.6)

0.20 (0.5)

0.01 (0.8)

0.40 (0.3)

0.08 (0.6)

0.01 (0.8)

  1. BOT-2 Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition, Gross Motor Proficiency; DCCS NIH toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test; K1-K2, H1-H5, and M1-M4 are described in detail in Table 2. Boldfaced correlations are significant (p < .05). p-values in parentheses