Skip to main content

Table 3 Severity of UE in each impairment class in the high and low robotic assistance groups

From: Impact of the robotic-assistance level on upper extremity function in stroke patients receiving adjunct robotic rehabilitation: sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial

 

Severity of UE hemiplegia at baseline

Group

Pre-intervention

Post-intervention

Amount of change

p-value of two-way ANOVA (severity × group) in between-group comparisons (effect size)

FMA

FMA < 30

High RA group (N = 12)

14.8 ± 7.0

27.4 ± 13.2

12.7 ± 9.8

0.103 (η2 = 0.09)

  

Low RA group (N = 5)

20.0 ± 5.6

28.0 ± 7.8

8.0 ± 4.0

 
 

FMA > 30

High RA group (N = 5)

44.8 ± 5.2

48.6 ± 8.1

3.8 ± 5.8

 
  

Low RA group (N = 8)

46.6 ± 6.8

55.0 ± 2.9

9.3 ± 6.2

 

FMA-proximal (shoulder/elbow/forearm)

FMA < 30

High RA group (N = 12)

10.8 ± 5.5

18.6 ± 7.5

7.8 ± 5.4

0.038 (η2 = 0.13)

  

Low RA group (N = 5)

15.2 ± 3.6

19.0 ± 4.7

3.8 ± 3.3

 
 

FMA ≥ 30

High RA group (N = 5)

27.4 ± 3.4

27.6 ± 3.2

0.2 ± 1.5

 
  

Low RA group (N = 8)

27.4 ± 4.7

31.1 ± 2.9

3.8 ± 4.3

 

WMFT-PT

FMA < 30

High RA group (N = 12)

1466.2 ± 266.4

1137.3 ± 357.1

− 328.9 ± 298.4

0.021 (η2 = 0.17)

  

Low RA group (N = 5)

1524.0 ± 226.6

1280.8 ± 241.3

− 242.0 ± 51.0

 
 

FMA ≥ 30

High RA group (N = 5)

434.8 ± 289.1

5511.8 ± 378.3

77.0 ± 233.0

 
  

Low RA group (N = 8)

477.6 ± 301.7

-341.9 ± 292.7

− 341.9 ± 292.7

 

WMFT-FAS

FMA < 30

High RA group (N = 12)

17.1 ± 9.1

26.3 ± 12.7

9.3 ± 13.3

0.045 (η2 = 0.14)

  

Low RA group (N = 5)

18.2 ± 8.6

22.4 ± 8.7

4.2 ± 8.2

 
 

FMA ≥ 30

High RA group (N = 5)

44.0 ± 12.9

43.6 ± 15.1

− 0.4 ± 8.3

 
  

Low RA group (N = 8)

44.9 ± 4.9

56.9 ± 0.7

11.4 ± 6.0

 
  1. Data are presented as mean ± SD
  2. UE upper extremity, FMA Fugl-Meyer Assessment, RA robotic assistance, WMFT Wolf Motor Function Test, PT performance time, FAS Functional Assessment Scale, ANOVA analysis of variance