Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Fig. 3

From: Assessing inertial measurement unit locations for freezing of gait detection and patient preference

Fig. 3

Survey results highlight patient preferences and wearability (n = 16). a Breakdown of individual sensor wearability scores. Scores ranged from 0 (definitely would NOT wear) to 4 (would happily wear, if asked). b Counts of top decision factor for determining wearability. Note, three participants did not answer the question associated with this, which involved ranking factors from least to most important. c Counts of top-ranked sensor set preferences for each of the 3-, 2-, and 1-IMU sets. Write-in sets (not offered as options) are indicated by “other.”

Back to article page