Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Table 2 Means ± standard deviation (SD) and statistical comparisons of postural measures across the two groups for the whole trial in each of the two virtual scenes

From: The effects of visual context on visual-vestibular mismatch revealed by electrodermal and postural response measures

		+ VVM	−VVM
Measure	Scene	Mean ± SD	Mean ± SD	t-statistic	p-value
RMS AP	Space	12.65 ± 5.96	12.23 ± 6.71	− 0.18	0.85
RMS AP	Street	12.00 ± 7.85	12.27 ± 7.65	0.14	0.88
RMS ML	Space	10.67 ± 3.56	10.21 ± 5.86	− 0.13	0.89
RMS ML	Street	11.10 ± 2.67	9.37 ± 7.46	− 0.81	0.42
RMS VERT	Space	8.93 ± 8.92	4.16 ± 2.00	− 2.30	0.02*
RMS VERT	Street	7.96 ± 9.64	4.01 ± 6.78	− 2.63	0.01*
NPL AP	Space	11.50 ± 4.59	10.14 ± 7.98	− 0.67	0.50
NPL AP	Street	10.62 ± 5.06	9.72 ± 10.28	− 0.60	0.54
NPL ML	Space	10.34 ± 3.42	9.19 ± 4.85	− 0.39	0.69
NPL ML	Street	10.49 ± 5.64	7.49 ± 5.40	− 1.71	0.09
NPL VERT	Space	9.36 ± 8.20	4.13 ± 2.73	− 2.54	0.01*
NPL VERT	Street	7.85 ± 8.91	3.60 ± 4.47	− 3.02	0.004*

*Significant differences are in bold
Positive visual-vestibular mismatch (+ VVM); Negative visual-vestibular mismatch (− VVM); Root mean square (RMS); Normalized path length (NPL); Anteroposterior (AP); Mediolateral (ML); Vertical (VERT)

Back to article page

ISSN: 1743-0003

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com