Skip to main content

Table 5 Descriptive statistics across visualization technologies in Experiment 2

From: Naturalistic visualization of reaching movements using head-mounted displays improves movement quality compared to conventional computer screens and proves high usability

Variable

IVR

AR

2D Screen

Movement duration normalized (s/m)

11.99 (± 1.73)

12.6 (± 1.1)

19.39 (± 7.89)

Trajectory straightness ratio (n.u.)

1.58 (± 0.19)

1.58 (± 0.17)

1.98 (± 0.3)

Peak velocity (m/s)

0.29 (± 0.06)

0.28 (± 0.06)

0.26 (± 0.06)

Velocity peaks number (n.u.)

4.92 (± 1.41)

4.83 (± 0.97)

8.72 (± 4.79)

Movement onset (s)

0.87 (± 0.18)

0.93 (± 0.1)

1.58 (± 0.87)

Counting accuracy (%)

95.83 (± 4.17)

93.33 (± 5.78)

93.75 (± 4.89)

Cognitive load—RTLX\(^{1}\)

22.81 (± 22.5)

26.35 (± 22.21)

29.95 (± 26.02)

Usability–SUS\(^{2}\)

83.0 (± 13.62)

69.5 (± 25.15)

68.5 (± 27.7)

  1. Mean values and standard deviations of the movement quality, movement onset, cognitive load with a parallel task, self-reported cognitive load, and usability across visualization technologies for the brain-injured patients
  2. \(^{1}\) Slider 1–100
  3. \(^{2}\) 7 Likert scale rescaled to 0-100