Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of the studies in the literature, categorised into the Manual (M), Controlled (C), Voluntary (V) and Static (NS) approaches and type of measure

From: Technology-assisted assessment of spasticity: a systematic review

Stretch

Measure

Construct

Discriminant

Clinical

Repeatability

Sensitivity

# limbs

#

References

  

(2/2)

(Significant)

(\(\ge\)Strong)

(Excellent)

(Reported)

(P/PC+HC)

  

M

MA+KI

65

4

27

19

8

453/45+22

26

[17, 40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]

MA+KI+FT

89

33

11

33

0

259/0+78

9

[38, 55, 65,66,67,68,69,70,71]

KI+FT

13

63

13

13

0

344/16+29

8

[41, 72,73,74,75,76,77,78]

KI

14

57

57

57

0

119/19+93

7

[35,36,37, 79,80,81,82]

MA

0

33

17

17

0

242/41+40

6

[83,84,85,86,87,88]

Other

33

33

0

0

0

26/0+8

3

[89,90,91]

C

KI+FT

36

36

23

18

5

791/75+411

22

[34, 92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112]

MA+KI+FT

85

54

8

31

0

268/0+163

13

[113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125]

MA+KI

67

0

0

0

0

115/8+22

6

[60, 126,127,128,129,130]

KI

0

0

100

100

0

46/46+192

1

[131]

V

MA

0

20

20

0

0

60/22+8

5

[132,133,134,135,136]

MA+KI

60

40

40

0

0

80/34+37

5

[59, 137,138,139,140]

Other

0

33

33

0

0

80/80+124

3

[141,142,143]

NS

MP

0

83

50

0

0

257/153+0

6

[95, 95, 132, 144,145,146]

MA

0

40

20

0

0

178/116+64

5

[70, 81, 146,147,148]

Other

0

80

0

40

0

76/47+17

5

[39, 96, 122, 149, 150]

  1. It shows the percentage of the studies in each category that showed a construct validity of 2 (out of 2), a Significant discriminant validity, a greater than Strong correlation with a clinical measure, an Excellent repeatability and the percentage of those that included a sensitivity evaluation. The table also reports the total sample size for each category as: number of tested limbs (P), own control limbs (PC) and healthy subjects’ control limbs (HC); and the number of studies in each of the category. Note that these results do not account for the individual sample size of each study and aggregate studies reporting a poor property and studies not reporting it