Skip to main content

Table 3 GAM models

From: Kinematic analysis of sensorimotor control during the craniocervical flexion movement in patients with neck pain and asymptomatic individuals: a cross-sectional study

Linear regression

Smooth regression

 

Coefficient (SE)

t

ap value

 

EDF (dfref)

F

ap value

Craniocervical flexion ROM

 

Intercept

− 17.8 (2.6)

− 6.9

 < 0.001

Age

5.9(7)

2

0.08

Pain duration

0.014 (0.015)

1

0.3

Previous month VAS

4.2(5.1)

1.4

0.2

NDI

0.4 (0.2)

1.3

0.2

TSK11

2.3 (3)

4.3

0.01*

Craniocervical extension ROM

 

Intercept

1.07 (1)

1.1

0.3

TSK11

1.24 (1.442)

0.1

0.9

Age

0.1(0.02)

3.7

 < 0.001*

Previous month VAS

0.1 (0.2)

0.9

0.4

Pain duration (months)

− 0.01(0.004)

− 2.4

0.02*

NDI

− 0.1 (0.1)

− 0.8

0.4

Peak velocity in craniocervical flexion

 

Intercept

− 31.1 (4.2)

− 7.4

 < 0.001

Age

6.1 (7.2)

2.4

0.03*

Previous month VAS

− 0.5 (1)

− 0.5

0.6

Pain duration

2 (2.5)

1.7

0.2

NDI

0.6 (0.4)

1.4

0.2

TSK11

8.5(9)

4.3

 < 0.001*

Conjunct motion (Lateral flexion)

 

Intercept

1 (0.4)

2

0.04

Age

0.007 (0.01)

0.8

0.4

Previous month VAS

0.1 (0.1)

0.9

0.4

Pain duration (months)

− 0.004 (0.002)

− 2.7

0.01*

NDI

− 0.1(0.03)

− 2.2

0.03

    

TSK11

− 0.001 (0.02)

− 0.1

1

    
  1. SE standard error, EDF effective degrees of freedom, dfref reference degrees of freedom
  2. *Significant if p < 0.05