Skip to main content

Table 1 Sample characteristics, quality of life, and costs of training strategies

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of overground robotic training versus conventional locomotor training in people with spinal cord injury

 

Full sample

N = 99

Conventional training

N = 67

Overground robotic training

N = 32

Age in years

39 (16)

42 (16)

33 (13)

Sex Males N (%)

66 (66.67)

46 (68.66)

20 (62.50)

Race N (%)

 White or Caucasian

42 (42.42)

23 (34.33)

19 (59.38)

 Black or African American

42 (42.42)

35 (52.24)

7 (21.88)

 American Indian/Alaska Native

2 (2.02)

1 (1.49)

1 (3.13)

 Asian or Pacific Islander

3 (3.03)

1 (1.49)

2 (6.25)

 Other, multiracial

9 (9.09)

6 (8.96)

3 (9.38)

 Prefer not to answer

1 (1.01)

1 (1.49)

0 (0)

Time (years) from injury to study

4.8 (5.27)

5.07 (4.87)

4.22 (6.05)

Complete injury N (%)

19 (20.21)

10 (16.13)

9 (28.13)

Injury level N(%)

 C1–C8 (%)

39 (41.05)

24 (38.10)

15 (46.88)

 T1–T12 (%)

44 (46.32)

29 (46.03)

15 (46.88)

 L1–L5 (%)

12 (12.63)

10 (15.87)

2 (6.25)

 Unknown

4

4

0

  Paraplegia

53 (56.99)

38 (58.46)

15 (53.57)

  Tetraplegia

34 (36.56)

21 (32.31)

13 (46.43)

  Unknown

6 (6.45)

6 (9.23)

0 (0)

  Missing data

6

2

4

EQ-5D utility [0–1]

 Baseline utility

0.39 (0.34)

0.36 (0.34)

0.47 (0.32)

 Discharge utility

0.42 (0.36)

0.40 (0.36)

0.48 (0.37)

 Therapy minutes

1843 (2522)

1005 (1081)

3598 (3594)

Average cost (standard deviation)

2466 (2835)

1758 (1697)

3952 (3989)

  1. Mean(SD) unless otherwise noted