From: Bimanual movements in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of instrumented assessments
Study | Design | Participants | Type of instrument | Outcome measures | Intervention |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beani et al. 2020 [23] | Case control study | N = 50 (+ 50 TDC) Mean age (range) = 9.9 (3–25) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | Accelerometers | • Clinical scores: MACS • Quantitative measures: Asymmetry index, Mean activity count | |
Cacioppo et al. 2020 [24] | Case control study | N = 19 (+ 20 TDC) Mean age (range) = 11.3 (5–17) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: AHA • Quantitative measures: ROM MAX APS SPARC IOC | |
Cope et al. 2010 [30] | Experimental study | N = 10 Mean age (range) = 11 (7–14) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Peak velocity, Movement time, Movement units, ROM | CIMT |
Feltham et al. 2010a [31] | Case control study | N = 8* (+ 14 TDC) Mean age (range) = 13.9 (9–18) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Duration, Interlimb coupling, Continuous relative phase, Normalized jerk | |
Gaillard et al. 2019 [25] | Case control study | N = 20 (+ 20 TDC) Mean age (range) = 12 (6–18) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: AHA, Abilhand Kids • Quantitative measures: Angular waveforms, ROM MAX | |
Gordon et al. 2007 [26] | Experimental study | N = 20 Mean age (range) = 7.7 (3–15) Classification = uCP | Accelerometers & 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Time of use, Goal synchrony | HABIT/ Usual therapy |
Howcroft et al. 2012b [32] | Cohort study | N = 17 Mean age (SD) = 9.4 (1.5) Classification = uCP (15), bilateral CP (2) | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: ROM, Angular velocities, Accelerations | |
Hung et al. 2004 [33] | Cohort study | N = 10** Mean age (range) = 13.4 (8–16) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: JTHFT • Quantitative measures: Task completion time, Goal synchronization, Movement overlap time, Tangential velocity, Peak velocity difference | |
Hung et al. 2010 [34] | Case control study | N = 11** (+ 11 TDC) Mean age (range) = 13.1 (8–16) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Tangential velocity, Task completion time, Goal synchronization, Movement overlap, Task hand movement time | |
Hung et al. 2011 [35] | Experimental study | N = 20 Mean age (range) = 6.9 (4–10) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: AHA • Quantitative measures: Peak tangential velocity, Movement overlap time, Goal synchronization, Task completion time | HABIT/CIMT |
Hung et Meredith, 2014 [36] | Case control study | N = 10 (+ 10 TDC) Mean age (range) = 8.3 (7–11) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Difference in vertical position between hands, Vertical hand ROM, Lateral hand ROM, Elbow excursion, Shoulder excursion | |
Hung et al. 2017a. [27] | Experimental study | N = 20 Mean age (SD) = 8.5 (1.5) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Movement overlap time, Goal synchronization, Task completion time, C7 displacement, Upper arm and elbow joint angle excursion | Structured/ unstructured practice |
Hung et Spingarn, 2018 [37] | Experimental study | N = 7 Mean age (range) = 3.6 (2.4–4.5) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Movement overlap time, Goal synchronization, Task completion time, C7 displacement, Upper arm and elbow joint angle excursion | H-HABIT |
Hung et al. 2018 [38] | Case control study | N = 12 (+ 12 TDC) Mean age (range) = 8.3 (6–11) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: / • Quantitative measures: Movement time, Two hands offset/onset difference, Elbow/shoulder joint excursion | |
Hung et al. 2019 [28] | Cohort study | N = 39 Mean age (range) = 9.6 (6–17) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: AHA • Quantitative measures: Total movement time, Goal synchronization, Normalized movement overlap, C7 displacement | |
Hung et Zeng., 2020 [39] | Case control study | N = 10 (+ 10 TDC + 10 adults) Mean age (range) = 9.6 (6–11) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Peak velocity, Upper arm and elbow joint, C7 displacement, Hand height position differences, Timing differences at offset | |
Johansson et al. 2012 [40] | Case report | N = 2 Age = 17y and 13y Classification = uCP, MACS I/II | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Duration of the movement, 3D Distance, Number of movement units | SMT |
Johansson et al. 2014 [41] | Case report | N = 1 (+ 1 TDC) Age = 12y Classification = uCP, MACS II | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: 3D Distance, Number of movement units | SMT |
Klotz et al. 2014 [42] | Case control study | N = 16 (+ 17 TDC) Mean age (range) = 13 (9–17) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: MACS, Abilhand Kids • Quantitative measures: Movement time, ROM | |
Mutalib et al. 2019a. [43] | Case control study | N = 15 (+ 17 TD) Mean age (range) = 8.7 (5–14) Classification = uCP | A bespoke instrumented cube | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Duration, Isometric grasp force, Interlimb force asymmetry, SPARC | |
Rudisch, et al. 2016 [29] | Cohort study | N = 37 Mean age (SD) = 10.9 (2.6) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: CHEQ, JTHFT • Quantitative measures: Total task duration, Temporal Coupling, Spatial accuracy | |
Shum et al. 2020 [49] | Experimental study | N = 5 (+ 12 TDC) Mean age (range) = 17 (14–21) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | Kinect | • Clinical scores: *MACS • Quantitative measures: ROM, Peak velocity, Time to peak velocity, Smoothness, Trunk compensation | With / without EA |
Smorenburg et al. 2011 [44] | Cohort study | N = 10* Mean age (range) = 12.7 (7–17) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Continuous relative phase | |
Smorenburg et al. 2012a [45] | Cohort study | N = 23 Mean age (range) = 14.2 (9–19) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Absolute error, Average velocity, Relative movement smoothness | |
Smorenburg et al. 2013 [46] | Experimental study | N = 16 Mean age (range) = 15.8 (10–19) Classification = uCP, MACS I/II/III | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Absolute error | Visual / mirror feedback |
Sugden et Utley, 1995 [49] | Cohort study | N = 17 Mean age (range) = 9.8 (4–18) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Duration, Mean/peak velocity, Location of peak velocity, Interlimb coupling | |
Utley et Sugden,1998 [50] | Cohort study | N = 11 Mean age (range) = 7.9 (5–12) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Mean, peak velocity, Intra/interlimb coupling, Duration of movement | |
Utley et al. 2004 [51] | Cohort study | N = 8 Mean age (range) = 8.1 (5–11) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: • Mean, peak velocity, Intra/interlimb coupling, Grasp aperture, Duration of movement | |
Utley et al. 2007 [52] | Case control study | N = 9 (+ 7 TDC) Mean age (range) = 7.8 (5–12) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Mean, peak velocity, Intra/interlimb coupling, Mean maximum displacement | |
Van Thiel et al. 2001 [53] | Cohort study | N = 5 Mean age (range) = 18 (15–20) Classification = uCP | 3DMA | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Movement time, Joint displacement, Dysfluency of the hand movement, Onset asynchrony, Variability of onset asynchrony, Peak asynchrony, Variability of peak asynchrony | |
Volman et al. 2020 [47] | Cohort study | N = 12 Mean age (range) = 10.7 (8–14) Classification = uCP | Digitizer | • Clinical scores: – • Quantitative measures: Cycle duration, Amplitude and circularity, Smoothness, Relative phase |