Skip to main content

Table 2 Stimulation effect on the complexity of \(sEMG_{\text{RMS}}\)

From: Epidural stimulation restores muscle synergies by modulating neural drives in participants with sensorimotor complete spinal cord injuries

Control vs Stim

Muscle

BMCA Tasks

Name

BL-Hip

R-Hip

L-Hip

BL-Ankle

R-Ankle

L-Ankle

R-IL

0.42

0.1

0.42

0.35

0.56

0.69

R-RF

0.08

0.44

0.29

0.29

0.25

0.06

R-TA

0.01

0.02

0.26

0.81

0.81

0.46

R-EHL

0.02

0.03

0.86

0.52

0.58

0.40

R-GAS

0.03

0.07

0.48

0.69

0.63

0.04

L-IL

0.72

0.93

0.46

0.04

0.03

0.19

L-RF

0.06

0.48

0.10

0.72

0.02

0.58

L-TA

0.40

0.05

0.12

0.79

0.001

0.71

L-EHL

0.13

0.79

0.05

0.15

0.04

0.19

L-GAS

0.26

0.41

0.06

0.88

0.006

0.72

No stim vs Stim

Muscle

BMCA Tasks

Name

BL-Hip

R-Hip

L-Hip

BL-Ankle

R-Ankle

L-Ankle

R-IL

0.00003

0.00005

0.00004

0.0001

0.0001

0.00021

R-RF

0.0005

0.00001

0.00024

0.00015

0.0001

0.00025

R-TA

0.00001

0.0001

0.0005

0.00002

0.0001

0.00001

R-EHL

0.0001

0.0002

0.00001

0.00002

0.00008

0.00002

R-GAS

0.00001

0.0001

0.00005

0.0002

0.0002

0.00002

L-IL

0.0002

0.0001

0.00003

0.0005

0.00014

0.0001

L-RF

0.0002

0.0005

0.00005

0.0006

0.0005

0.00008

L-TA

0.0004

0.00005

0.00001

0.0003

0.0001

0.00003

L-EHL

0.0003

0.0004

0.00001

0.0001

0.0004

0.0001

L-GAS

0.0005

0.0004

0.00002

0.0004

0.00005

0.00001

  1. The p values shown in the table are based on Wilcoxon sign rank (No stim vs Stim) and Mann–Whitney U tests (Control vs Stim). The bold fonts within the table indicate statistically significant differences p < 0.0007