Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Fig. 1

From: Dealing with the heterogeneous presentations of freezing of gait: how reliable are the freezing index and heart rate for freezing detection?

Fig. 1

Overview of the performed gait tasks. Each round started with 10 s of standing at the starting point followed by 360 degree turns in alternating directions with and without a cDT (30 s each, in pseudorandomized order). Next, the participants preceded with the gait trajectory as indicated by the orange arrows, passing between the chair and wall (47 cm wide); passing through the doorway (89 cm wide) into the narrow quarter where they completed a 180 and 360 degree turn in alternating directions; passing between the chairs (54 cm wide); walking straight, making a 180 degree turn and walking back between the chairs and the chair and the wall to the starting point where the gait trajectory was started over. The gait trajectory was performed with a cDT, a mDT or noDT for 90 s each, in a pseudorandomized order. In total, at least four of such rounds of approximately 6 min each were completed and in between each round participants could rest as long as needed. All gait tasks were recorded by three video cameras positioned at strategic locations of the lab. (cDT cognitive dual-task, mDT motor dual-task, noDT no dual-task)

Back to article page