Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical scores and kinematic/kinetic parameters at the baseline and follow-up evaluation

From: Changes of gait pattern in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A: a 18 months follow-up study

  

Controls

CMT1A-all

NL subgroup

FD subgroup

FD&POD subgroup

  

(N=18)

(N=16)

(N=7)

(N=6)

(N=3)

 

Session

 

Baseline

Follow-up

Baseline

Follow-up

Baseline

Follow-up

Baseline

Follow-up

 

Age [years]

11.0(3.3)

11.7(2.9)

13.2(2.9)

11.6(2.4)

13.0(2.4)

12.0(3.0)

13.6(2.9)

11.5(4.7)

12.9(4.8)

 

Weight [kg]

41.4(14.3)

40.4(10.5)

45.9(11.3)

37.7(12.1)

46.1(15.7)

44.3(8.8)

47.4(6.3)

39.1(10.7)

42.8(10.1)

 

Height [cm]

146(22)

148(15)

158(14)

145(16)

156(17)

152(12)

163(8)

147(22)

150(17)

Clinical scores

          
 

CMTES

-

3.4(2.3)

4.8(3.4)#

2.4(1.3)

3.5(2.1)

3.5(2.8)

5.2(4.3)

5.3(2.3)

7.0(4.3)

ONLS

-

1.9(1.0)

2.4(1.0)

1.4(0.8)

2.4(1.0)

1.7(0.8)

2.0(1.1)

3.3(0.6)

3.3(0.6)

Natural walking

          
 

Gait speed [ms-1]

1.1(0.1)

1.2(0.1)

1.1(0.1)

1.1(0.1)

1.2(0.1)

1.2(0.1)

1.1(0.1)

1.0(0.1)

1.0(0.2)

Gait speed/BH [%BH s-1]

77.0(7.0)

78.7(9.8)

74.7(13.3)

79.2(12.4)

77.7(13.9)

81.6(6.9)

72.6(9.1)#

71.8(6.2)

70.8(20.4)

Cadence [steps min-1]

116(11)

117(10)

115(12)

115(13)

117(13)

119(7)

112(9)#

117(7)

117(19)

Stride length [m]

1.2(0.2)

1.2(0.1)

1.2(0.1)

1.2(0.1)

1.3(0.1)#

1.2(0.1)

1.2(0.0)

1.1(0.1)

1.1(0.1)

Stride length/BH [%BH]

79.8(4.1)

80.7(5.8)

78.3(7.9)#

82.0(5.0)

81.0(6.8)

82.1(5.3)

78.6(5.9)

75.1(6.7)

71.7(12.4)

AROM ratio

0.65(0.09)

0.55(0.20) *

0.51(0.21)

0.74(0.09)

0.63(0.18)

0.46(0.04)a,b

0.47(0.20)

0.26(0.03)a,b,c

0.27(0.09)

AW st [J/kg]

0.36(0.10)

0.28(0.07) *

0.28(0.06)

0.30(0.06)

0.29(0.05)

0.31(0.04)

0.30(0.04)

0.17(0.02)a

0.19(0.03)

Toe-heel walking

          
 

ATHΔmean

27.8(8.9)

16.9(7.6) *

15.4(8.3)

20.7(7.6)

20.0(6.2)

17.7(5.9)a

15.7(7.8)

14.3(7.5)a

13.4(3.2)

  1. The table shows clinical scores and kinematic/kinetic parameters at the baseline and follow-up evaluation for the whole group of CMT patients (CMT1A-all) and for the different subgroups (NL normal-like, FD Foot-drop, FD&POD Foot-drop and Push-off Deficit). Data from the control group are reported in the first column. Data are given in terms of mean and SD (in parentheses).
  2. The two parameters used to classify patients into sub-groups based on the baseline evaluation are evidenced in bold (AROM ratio foot-drop index, AW st push-off deficit index). BH Body height, Toe-heel Toe- and Heel-walking trials. See the text (section Methods) for the meaning of biomechanical parameters.
  3. * Significant differences between controls and CMT1A-all group at baseline (p<0.05 T-test).
  4. a Significant differences between controls and CMT1A sub-groups at baseline (p<0.05 ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc).
  5. b Significant differences between NL and FD or FD&POD group at baseline (p<0.05 ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc).
  6. c Significant differences between FD and FD&POD group at baseline (p<0.05 ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc).
  7. # Significant differences between baseline and follow-up evaluation (p<0.05 paired T-test for biomechanical indexes and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for clinical scores).