Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of MuRf-1 protein expression in bilateral muscles(—X ± s)

From: The effects of different tensile parameters for the neurodynamic mobilization technique on tricipital muscle wet weight and MuRf-1 expression in rabbits with sciatic nerve injury

Group Lesion lateral Normal lateral
Sham group(n = 6) 0.05 ± 0.00 0.050 ± 0.000
Model group(n = 6) 1.04 ± 0.05* 0.052 ± 0.000
NMT-A group(n = 6) 0.67 ± 0.07# 0.051 ± 0.000
NMT-B group(n = 6) 0.43 ± 0.04▲ 0.051 ± 0.000
NMT-C group(n = 6) 1.01 ± 0.03 0.050 ± 0.000
  1. Lesioned lateral compared with normal lateral muscle, *#▲p < 0.05 in the model, NMT-B, NMT-A, and NMT-C group, respectively.
  2. In the lesioned lateral, the MuRf-1 protein expression in the model, NMT-B, NMT-A, and NMT-C group compared with in the sham group, *#▲p < 0.05; the MuRf-1 protein expression in the NMT-B and NMT-A compared with in the model group, #▲p < 0.05; the MuRf-1 protein expression in the NMT-B compared with in the NMT-A and NMT-C group, # p < 0.05.