Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of studies: outcomes, measures and results

From: The effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training for paediatric gait disorders: systematic review

Group studies

Outcome of interest

Measure

Component of health

   

Body structure/function

Activity and participation

Contextual factors

Druzbicki 2010 [15]

Balance

Parameters of balance using balance platform

Exp 5/14 parameters improved (p < 0.05).

Control – 0/14 (NSD)

  

Druzbicki 2013 [18]

Gait

3D gait

 

NSD

 

Smania 2011 [4]

Gait speed

Distance

Gait

Function

10MWT

6MinWT

3D gait WeeFIM

 

p = 0.008

p = 0.008

NSD

NSD

 

Nikityuk 2016 [20]

Balance

Stabilometry

Plantography

Improvements in RAGT plus FES superior to RAGT alone

  

Brutsch 2011 [14]

Joint motion

Engagement in therapy

Biofeedback values

Self-designed questionnaire: enjoyment of VR

p < 0.001

Enjoyed DVD most, but led to reduced engagement

  

Patritti 2010 [5]

Distance

Gait speed

Standing

Walking

Gait

6MinWT

10MWT

GMFM 66: D GMFM 66: E

3D gait

 

NSD

Better with augmented f/b

NSD

 

Schroeder 2014 [19]

Standing Walking

Gait speed

Distance

Self-goals

GMFM 66: D

GMFM 66: E

10MWT

6MinWT

COPM

 

P < 0.01a

P < 0.01a

NSD

NSD

P < 0.05

 

Bayon 2016 [17]

Gait

Range of movement

3D gait

Trunk rotation &hip flex/ext

‘specific developments’

‘improved’

 

Borggraefe 2008 [21]

Distance

Gait speed

Standing

Walking

6MinWT

10MWT

GMFM 66: D GMFM 66: E

 

55 m to 115 m 0.25 to 0.6 m/s

12.8 to 25.6%

18.1–26.4%

 

Borggraefe 2010 [25]

Standing Walking

GMFM 66: D

GMFM 66: E

 

p−0.001

p < 0.001

 

Borggraefe 2010 [12]

Adverse events

Number

Significance

47 AE in 38 pts

Mild−moderate

  

Borggraefe 2010 [22] (6/12 follow-up)

Standing Walking

Gait speed

Distance

GMFM 66: D

GMFM 66: E

10MWT

6MinWT

 

P < 0.05

P < 0.05

P < 0.05

P < 0.05

 

Koenig 2008 [16]

Realism of feedback

Questionnaire

‘Satisfactory impression’

  

Meyer-Heim 2007 [13]

Mobility

Gait speed

Standing

Walking

Gait assist

Distance

Walk time, walk distance

10MWT

GMFM 66: D

GMFM 66: E

FAC

6MinWT

 

NSD

p < 0.001 (inpt)

p = 0.01 (outpt)

p < 0.05 (inpt)

p < 0.01 (in/outpt)

NSD

p < 0.05

Meyer-Heim 2009 [23]

Gait speed

Standing

Walking

Gait assist

Distance

10MWT

GMFM 66: D

GMFM 66: E

FAC

6MinWT

 

P < 0.01

P = 0.05

NSD

NSD

NSD

Schroeder 2014 [11]

Standing Walking

GMFM 66: D

GMFM 66: E

 

P < 0.05a

P < 0.05a

 

Van Hedel 2015 [24]

Function

Gait speed

Standing

Walking

Gait assist

Distance

WeeFIM

10MWT

GMFM 66: D

GMFM 66: E

FAC

6MinWT

 

P = 0.003

P = 0.018

NSD

NSD

NSD

NSD

  1. Exp experimental group, NSD no significant difference between experimental and control group outcomes, 3D gait 3 dimensional gait analysis, 10MWT 10 m walk test, 6MinWT 6 minute walk test, Wee FIM functional independence measure for children, FES functional electric stimulation, VR virtual reality, DVD digital video disc, GMFM 66: D gross motor function measure 66 part D, GMFM 66: E gross motor function measure 66 part E, f/b feedback, COPM Canadian occupational performance measure, flex/ext flexion/extension, AE adverse event, FAC functional ambulation classification, inpt inpatient, outpt outpatient, a = minimum clinically important difference