On the design of EEG-based movement decoders for completely paralyzed stroke patients

Table 2 Electrode-frequency pairs used during the online intervention

Pat. #	Group	Channel	Frequency
1	Exp.	P7	11.5–14.5
2		C4, P4, P8	8.5–11.5
3		C4, P4, P8	8.5–11.5
4		C4, P4, P8	8.5–11.5
5		P7	5.5–8.5
6		C4, P4	14.5–17.5
7		C4, P8	17.5–20.5
8		C3	11.5–14.5
9		C4	5.5–8.5
10		C3, P3, P7	8.5–11.5
11		C3	5.5–8.5
12		C3	5.5–8.5
13		P7	5.5–8.5
14		C4, P4, P8	8.5–11.5
15		C4	5.5–8.5
16		P7	5.5–8.5
33	C-	F4, C4, P8	14.5–17.5
34		F4, C4, P8	17.5–20.5
35		F4, C4, P4, P8	20.5–23.5
36		C4, P4, P8	8.5–11.5
37		C4, P8	9.5–12.5

Group indicates if the patient performed the Experimental—contingent positive condition (Exp), or the contingent negative condition (C-). Patients from the sham group are excluded from this table since they did not receive closed-loop feedback. Channel and frequency correspond to the electrodes and frequencies used to provide contingent feedback during the intervention

ISSN: 1743-0003