Budget impact analysis of robotic exoskeleton use for locomotor training following spinal cord injury in four SCI Model Systems

Table 3 Current and projected proportion of locomotor training in base case analysis

	Current locomotor training offerings	Current Market Share per locomotor strategy/number of locomotor sessions*	Future Market Share per locomotor strategy /number of locomotor sessions
Facility A, 2752 locomotor sessions/year	BWSTT	33% / 908	31% / 881
	Stationary robotic	16% / 440	11% / 303
	Over-ground training	51% / 1404	48% / 1293
	Robotic Exoskeleton		10% / 275
Facility B, 3968 locomotor sessions/year	BWSTT	61% / 2420	56% / 2063
	Stationary robotic	5% / 198	3% / 119
	Over-ground training	34% / 1349	31% / 1309
	Robotic Exoskeleton		10% / 397
Facility C, 2256 locomotor sessions/year	BWSTT	34% / 767	30% / 677
	Stationary robotic	33% / 744	30% / 677
	Over-ground training	33% / 744	30% / 677
	Robotic Exoskeleton		10% / 226
Facility D, 3105 locomotor sessions/year	BWSTT	39% / 1211	36%/1118
	Stationary robotic	10% / 311	7%/217
	Over-ground training	51% / 1584	47%/1459
	Robotic Exoskeleton		10%/311

* Number of locomotor sessions per user and locomotor strategy market share is based on facility averages and utilization rates. BWSTT, body-weight supported treadmill training

ISSN: 1743-0003