Table 3 PROBAST
Criteria | Specification of the review question |
|---|---|
Step 1: Specify your systematic review question | |
 Intended use of the model: | Prediction of functional outcome after rehabilitation treatment of post-stroke patients |
 Participants: | Adults post-stroke participants selected independently on the timing of the event or type of stroke |
 Predictors: | Any kind of predictor was included, more specifically any type included in the following categories of stroke assessment: biomechanical assessment, functional assessment, demographic characteristics, medical history, stroke assessment and neurological assessment. The selected predictors are related to the admission or recovery phase only, excluding predictors variables collected at discharge |
 Outcome: | Any kind of functional outcome, not exclusively cognitive or sensory-related was selected |
Study | Outcome | Type of prediction study |
|---|---|---|
Step 2: Classify the type of prediction model evaluation | ||
 Almubark et al. | Upper extremity home use | Development only |
 Bates et al. | Physical grade achievement | Development only |
 Berlowitz et al. | Functional outcome | Development only |
 Bland et al. | Walking ability | Development only |
 Cheng et al. | Recovery | Development only |
 Li et al. | Functional status | Development only |
 De Marchis et al. | Unfavourable functional outcome | Development and validation |
 De Ridder et al. | Disability and functional outcome | Development and validation |
 George et al. | Extent of motor recovery after constraint-induced movement therapy | Development only |
 König et al. | Functional independence | Development and validation |
 Kuceyeski et al. | Clinical performance | Development only |
 Abdel Majeed et al. | Change in clinical outcomes | Development only |
 Masiero et al. | Ambulation | Development only |
 Mostafavi et al. | Assessment of impairment | Development only |
 Sale et al. | Motor improvement | Development only |
 Scrutinio, Lanzillo, et al. | Functional status | Development only |
 Scrutinio, Guida, et al. | Treatment failure | Development only |
 Sonoda et al. | Stroke outcome | Development only |
 Zariffa et al. | Measure of upper-limb function | Development only |
Domain | Risk of bias (number of models) | Applicability (number of models) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dev | Val | Dev | Val | |
Step 3: Assess risk of bias and applicability | ||||
 Participants | High = 0 Unclear = 0 Low = 174 | High = 0 Unclear = 0 Low = 174 | High = 0 Unclear = 0 Low = 174 | High = 0 Unclear = 0 Low = 174 |
 Predictors | High = 1 Unclear = 0 Low = 173 | High = 1 Unclear = 0 Low = 173 | High = 1 Unclear = 0 Low = 173 | High = 1 Unclear = 0 Low = 173 |
 Outcome | High = 24 Unclear = 120 Low = 30 | High = 24 Unclear = 120 Low = 30 | High = 24 Unclear = 119 Low = 31 | High = 24 Unclear = 119 Low = 31 |
 Analysis | High = 77 Unclear = 8 Low = 89 | |||
 Overall | High = 85 Unclear = 67 Low = 22 | High = 35 Unclear = 110 Low = 29 | ||