Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of participant and study design characteristics for all included studies

From: Determining optimal mobile neurofeedback methods for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults with non-progressive neurological disorders: a scoping review

Study

Months post injury

Subject # (males)

Subject # NFT group

Task

Sessions

Control condition

Cointervention

Feedback type(s)

Functional outcomes

Sackett’s level

Bhagat (2020) [65]

9–106

10 (7)

10

Reaching

12

–

–

Robotic

FMA-UE, ARAT, GS, JTHF

IV

Biasiucci (2018) [22]

10

27 (16)

14

Wrist and finger extension

10

Sham FES

PT

FES

FMA-UE, MRC, MAS, ESS

III

Chen (2020) [23]

1–6

14 (12)

7

Wrist extension

12

MA with no FB

PT/OT/low frequency ES

Robotic

FMA-UE

II

Chowdhury (2018) [66]

6

4 (2)

4

Grasping

12–16

–

Robotic therapy

Robotic, Visual

ARAT, GS

IV

Chowdhury (2020) [67]

17–28

5 (2)

5

Grasping

12

–

Robotic therapy

Robotic, Visual

ARAT, GS

IV

Cisotto (2016) [59]

12

2 (2)

2

Reaching

10

–

–

Robotic, Visual

RTT

IV

Daly (2009) [72]

10

1 (0)

1

Finger extension

9

–

PT/OT/FES

FES, Visual

Volitional finger control

V

Ibáñez (2017) [68]

36–60

4 (4)

4

Reaching

8

–

–

FES

FMA-UE, SIS

V

Jang (2016) [63]

6

20 (10)

10

Shoulder ab/adduction

30

FES

OT

FES

MFT, MAS

II

Jovanovic (2020)[73]

72

1 (1)

1

Reaching and grasping

80

–

–

FES

FMA-UE, ARAT, FIM, TRI - HFT

V

Marquez-Chin (2016) [74]

72

1 (1)

1

Reaching

40

–

–

FES

FMA-UE, ARAT, FIM, TRI-HFT

V

McCrimmon (2015)[70]

6

9 (6)

9

Ankle dorsiflexion

12

–

–

FES

FMA-LE, 6MWD, Ankle ROM, Gait Speed

IV

Mrachacz- Kersting (2016) [61]

9–24

22 (19)

13

Ankle dorsiflexion

1

Sham FES

–

FES

10mWT, FMA-LE, AS, TAP frequency, NIH-SS

III

Mrachacz- Kersting (2019) [26]

4

24 (18)

12

Ankle dorsiflexion

12

70% motor threshold ES

-

FES

10 mWT, FMA-LE, modified RS, AS

II

Mukaino (2014) [75]

14

1 (1)

1

Finger extension (hand opening)

10

MA with No FB

OT

FES

FMA-UE, MAS

V

Norman (2018)[69]

6

8 (8)

8

Fingers extension (hand opening)

12

–

Robotic therapy

Visual

Box and Block Test

IV

Ono (2013) [76]

14

1 (1)

1

Fingers extension (hand opening)

15

FES

OT

FES

FMA-UE, MAS

V

Osuagwu (2016) [64]

3

12 (12)

7

Hand opening and closing

20

FES

PT/OT

FES, Visual

Wrist ROM, MMT

II

Ramos-Murguialday (2013) [4]

10

30 (18)

16

Hand opening and closing

20

Sham Robotic FB

PT

Robotic

combined FMA-UE, MAS, MAL, GAS

II

Remsik (2019)[41]

\(\tilde{1}\)–100

21 (9)

21

Grasping

9–15

Delayed Intervention

–

FES, Visual

ARAT, 9-HPT, NIH-SS, GS, SIS, Barthel Index

II

Silvoni (2013) [60]

\(\tilde{1}08\)

1 (0)

1

Reaching

6

–

–

Robotic, Visual

RTT

V

Takahashi (2012) [77]

30

1 (1)

1

Ankle dorsiflexion

1

FES

-

FES, Visual

Ankle ROM

V

Vourvopoulos (2019) [71]

6

4 (3)

4

Reaching (wrist and elbow extension)

8

–

–

Visual

FMA, SIS, MAS

IV

  1. FB feedback; FMA-UE Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity; ARAT Action Research Arm Test; GS Grip Strength; MRC Medical Research Council; MAS Modified Ashworth Scale; FES Functional Electrical Stimulation; ES Electrical Stimulation; ESS European Stroke Scale; RTT Reaction Time Test; SIS Stroke Impact Scale; MFT Muscle Function Test; FIM Functional Independence Measure; TRI-HFT Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test; 10mWT 10-meter Walk Test; 6mWD 6 Minute Walk Distance; AS= Ashworth scale; mRS modified Rankin Scale; BBT Box and Blocks Test; cFMA combined Fugl-Meyer Assessment; MAL motor activity log; GAS Goal Attainment Scale; 9-HPT 9-Hole Peg Test; NIH-SS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; MMT Manual Muscle Test; ROM= Range of Motion; OT Occupational Therapy; PT Physical Therapy; JBTH=Jebsen Taylor Hand Function, SCI Spinal Cord Injury